Tag Archives: Legislature

Biden made ‘Obamacare’ cheaper, now sign-up deadline is right here

[ad_1]

Midnight on Sunday is the deadline for shoppers to benefit from a particular “Obamacare” join interval, courtesy of President Joe Biden

“We have seen even within the final couple of weeks elevated curiosity in enrollment,” Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure stated in an interview. “If you make protection extra reasonably priced, folks purchase it. What we have to do is to make protection extra reasonably priced.”

Biden’s particular enrollment interval ends at midnight native time Sunday across the nation. The common annual sign-up season will not begin once more till Nov. 1.

Curiosity has been excessive in a few states feeling the scourge of the delta variant. Almost 490,000 folks have signed up in Florida, and greater than 360,000 have accomplished so in Texas.

At a nonprofit service middle in Austin, Texas, greater than 500 folks have enrolled thus far with the assistance of employees and volunteers. Basis Communities well being program director Aaron DeLaO stated the schedule is booked and so they’re working to clear the ready record.

“Particularly with the delta variant, persons are fascinated about their well being a bit extra,” he stated.

The appliance course of will be difficult, requiring particulars about citizenship or authorized immigrant standing, revenue, and family members. That is earlier than a client even picks a medical health insurance plan. Individuals can apply on-line, by way of the HealthCare.gov name middle, or by packages just like the one in Austin.

About 9 in 10 prospects at Basis Communities have chosen commonplace “silver” plans, which value considerably extra however provide higher monetary safety when sickness strikes. “That to me says that persons are actually all for having complete protection,” stated DeLaO.

The Obama-era Reasonably priced Care Act presents sponsored non-public insurance coverage to individuals who haven’t got job-based protection, out there in each state. The ACA additionally expanded Medicaid for low-income adults, an choice most states have taken. The 2 elements cowl about 27 million folks, in accordance with the nonpartisan Kaiser Household Basis.

“Obamacare’s” place amongst authorities well being packages appears safe now, after greater than a decade of fruitless efforts by Republicans to repeal it or get the Supreme Court docket to overturn it. Earlier this 12 months by a vote of 7-2 the conservative-leaning court docket dismissed the most recent problem.

The subsidy will increase in Biden’s COVID legislation have made a tangible distinction. The typical premium paid by new prospects dropped from $117 a month to $85 a month, or 27%, with the extra beneficiant assist. In line with CMS, the median — or midpoint — deductible went from $450 to $50, a discount of practically 90%. Individuals who already had ACA protection may get the elevated assist by going again to the insurance coverage market. Individuals who’ve had a spell of unemployment are eligible for added breaks.

However the enhanced subsidies are good solely by 2022, and Biden is urgent Congress to make them everlasting. An extension appears more likely to be included within the Democrats’ $3.5 trillion home coverage bundle, nonetheless it is not assured to be everlasting, with so many different priorities competing for cash.

About 30 million folks stay uninsured, and a transparent majority could be eligible for ACA plans or another kind of protection. “In the event you construct it they will not essentially come,” stated Karen Pollitz, a medical health insurance skilled with the Kaiser Basis. “Individuals nonetheless have to be made conscious that there’s protection on the market.”

The Biden administration might make progress, however “this cannot be the top of the story,” stated well being economist Katherine Baicker of the College of Chicago.

It stays means too difficult for individuals who juggle low-paying jobs to get and maintain protection, Baicker defined. “There’s each a have to broaden entry to reasonably priced insurance coverage and to raised inform folks concerning the choices out there to them,” she stated.

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink

French protesters reject virus passes, vaccine mandate

[ad_1]

Tens of 1000’s of individuals throughout France are protesting new virus measures

PARIS — Some 160,000 individuals, together with far-right activists and members of France’s yellow vest motion, protested Saturday throughout the nation in opposition to a invoice requiring everybody to have a particular virus move to enter eating places and mandating COVID-19 vaccinations for all well being care staff.

Comparable protests have been held in neighboring Italy.

Police fired water cannons and tear fuel on rowdy protesters in Paris, though most gatherings have been orderly.

Legislators in France’s Senate have been debating the virus invoice Saturday after the decrease home of parliament accepted it on Friday, as virus infections are spiking and hospitalizations are rising. The French authorities needs to hurry up vaccinations to guard susceptible individuals and hospitals, and keep away from any new lockdown.

Most French adults are totally vaccinated and a number of polls point out a majority of French individuals assist the brand new measures. However not everybody.

Protesters chanting “Liberty! Liberty!” gathered at Bastille plaza and marched by way of jap Paris in considered one of a number of demonstrations Saturday round France. 1000’s additionally joined a gathering throughout the Seine River from the Eiffel Tower organized by a former prime official in Marine Le Pen’s anti-immigration social gathering.

Whereas most protesters have been calm, tensions erupted on the margins of the Bastille march. Riot police sprayed tear fuel on marchers after somebody threw a chair at an officer. Different projectiles have been additionally thrown. Later some protesters moved to the Arc de Triomphe and police used water cannon to disperse them.

Marchers included far-right politicians and activists in addition to others indignant at President Emmanuel Macron. They have been upset over a French “well being move” that’s now required to enter museums, film theaters and vacationer websites. The invoice beneath debate would increase the move requirement to all eating places and bars in France and another venues.

To get the move, individuals should be totally vaccinated, have a current destructive check or have proof they not too long ago recovered from the virus.

French lawmakers are divided over how far to go in imposing well being passes or necessary vaccinations however infections are rising rapidly. Greater than 111,000 individuals with the virus have died in France, and the nation is now seeing about 20,000 new infections a day, up from only a few thousand a day in early July.

Greater than 2 billion individuals worldwide have been vaccinated and details about COVID-19 vaccines is now extensively out there, however many protesters stated they felt they have been being rushed into one thing they are not able to do.

Céline Augen, a secretary at a health care provider’s workplace, is ready to lose her job beneath the brand new measure as a result of she doesn’t need to get vaccinated.

Ayoub Bouglia, an engineer, stated, “We have to wait a bit bit earlier than the French individuals can resolve … I believe part of France is at all times going to be unwilling and that blackmail and threats gained’t work.”

In Italy, 1000’s of protesters gathered in Rome, Milan, Verona and different cities Saturday, protesting the federal government’s determination to require a “Inexperienced Move” to entry indoor eating, native gala’s, stadiums, cinemas and different gathering locations.

Within the northern metropolis of Verona, a number of thousand individuals marched down the primary purchasing road, chanting “No Inexperienced Move!” and “Freedom!” They included households with younger youngsters, medical docs who stated they’re risking their jobs to not get vaccinated and individuals who likened the Inexperienced Move determination to selections by fascist dictatorships.

The demonstrations proceeded peacefully and dissipated into summer time night crowds.

Regardless of the vocal opposition, Italy’s new requirement, efficient Aug. 3, has led to a increase in vaccine appointments in Italy, the place up to now practically half of the eligible inhabitants is totally vaccinated.

———

Colleen Barry in Milan and Angela Charlton in Paris contributed.

———

Observe all AP tales on the coronavirus pandemic at https://apnews.com/hub/coronavirus-pandemic.

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink

Australia to amend legislation making Fb, Google pay for information

[ad_1]

The creator of proposed Australian legal guidelines that may make Fb and Google pay for journalism says his draft laws might be altered to allay a few of the digital giants’ considerations, however would stay essentially unchanged

Fb has warned it would block Australian information content material reasonably than pay for it.

Google has mentioned the proposed legal guidelines would lead to “dramatically worse Google Search and YouTube,” put free providers in danger and will result in customers’ information “being handed over to large information companies.”

Sims mentioned he’s discussing the draft of his invoice with the U.S. social media platforms. It might be launched into Parliament in late October.

“Google has received considerations about it, a few of it’s that they only don’t prefer it, others are issues that we’re fortunately going to interact with them on,” Sims advised a webinar hosted by The Australia Institute, an unbiased think-tank.

“We’ll make modifications to deal with a few of these points — not all, however some,” Sims mentioned.

Among the many considerations is a concern that underneath the so-called Information Media Bargaining Code, information companies “will be capable to someway management their algorithms,” Sims mentioned.

“We’ll have interaction with them and make clear that in order that there’s no means that the information media companies can intervene with the algorithms of Google or Fb,” Sims mentioned.

He mentioned he would additionally make clear that the platforms wouldn’t need to disclose extra information about customers than they already share.

“There’s nothing within the code that forces Google or Fb to share the information from people,” Sims mentioned.

Sims was not ready to barter the “core” of the code, which he described because the “bits of glue that maintain the code collectively, that make it workable.”

These included an arbitrator to deal with the bargaining imbalance between the tech giants and information companies. If a platform and a information outlet can’t attain an settlement on worth, an arbitrator could be appointed to make a binding choice.

One other core side was a non-discrimination clause to forestall the platforms from prioritizing Australia’s state-owned Australian Broadcasting Corp. and Particular Broadcasting Service, whose information content material will stay free.

Sims mentioned he didn’t know whether or not Fb would act on its risk and block Australian information, however he suspected that to take action would “weaken” the platform.

Spain and France and have each didn’t make Fb and Google pay for information by means of copyright legislation. Sims mentioned he has spoken about Australia’s method by means of truthful buying and selling legal guidelines to regulators in america and Europe.

“They’re all wrestling with the identical drawback,” Sims mentioned.

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink

US points sweeping new journey warning for China, Hong Kong

[ad_1]

The united states has issued a brand new advisory warning in opposition to journey to mainland China and Hong Kong, citing the danger of “arbitrary detention” and “arbitrary enforcement of native legal guidelines.”

BEIJING — The U.S. on Tuesday issued a sweeping new advisory warning in opposition to journey to mainland China and Hong Kong, citing the danger of “arbitrary detention” and “arbitrary enforcement of native legal guidelines.”

The advisory is more likely to heighten tensions between the perimeters which have spiked since Beijing’s imposition on Hong Kong of a strict new nationwide safety legislation in June that has already been met with a collection of U.S. punitive actions.

The assertion warned U.S. residents that China imposes “arbitrary detention and exit bans” to compel cooperation with investigations, stress members of the family to return to China from overseas, affect civil disputes and “acquire bargaining leverage over overseas governments.”

“U.S. residents touring or residing in China or Hong Kong, could also be detained with out entry to U.S. consular providers or details about their alleged crime. U.S. residents could also be subjected to extended interrogations and prolonged detention with out due technique of legislation,” the advisory stated.

In Hong Kong, China “unilaterally and arbitrarily workouts police and safety energy,” the advisory stated, including that new laws additionally covers offenses dedicated by non-Hong Kong residents or organizations outdoors of Hong Kong, presumably subjecting U.S. residents who’ve publicly criticized China to a “heightened threat of arrest, detention, expulsion, or prosecution.”

When in Hong Kong, U.S. residents are “strongly cautioned to pay attention to their environment and keep away from demonstrations,” the advisory stated.

Chinese language overseas ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin informed reporters at a each day briefing Tuesday that the U.S. ought to “absolutely respect the information and shouldn’t interact in unwarranted political manipulation” when issuing such advisories.

“China has at all times protected the security and authorized rights of foreigners in China in accordance with legislation. China is likely one of the most secure international locations on the planet,” Wang stated. “In fact, foreigners in China even have an obligation to abide by Chinese language legal guidelines.”

Final month, the Trump administration suspended or terminated three bilateral agreements with Hong Kong protecting extradition and tax exemptions, citing Beijing’s violation of its pledge for Hong Kong to retain broad autonomy for 50 years after the previous British colony’s 1997 handover to Chinese language rule.

Different Western nations have additionally suspended their extradition treaties with Hong Kong following the nationwide safety’s legislation’s passage.

The U.S. has additionally acted to finish particular commerce and industrial privileges that Hong Kong had loved and has imposed sanctions on Hong Kong and Chinese language officers, together with Hong Kong’s pro-Beijing chief Carrie Lam, concerned in imposing the brand new safety legislation.

Tensions between Beijing and Washington have hit their lowest level in a long time amid simmering disputes over commerce, know-how, Taiwan, Tibet, the South China Sea, the coronavirus pandemic and, most not too long ago, Hong Kong. The affect of the tensions has been felt within the tit-for-tat closures of diplomatic missions in addition to visa restrictions on college students and journalists.

The most recent journey advisory didn’t provide any new warnings concerning COVID-19 in mainland China and Hong Kong, however referred vacationers to earlier notices advising People to keep away from the areas and return residence from them if potential.

President Donald Trump has assigned full blame to Beijing for the coronavirus outbreak within the U.S., deflecting criticism of his personal dealing with of the pandemic that threatens his reelection.

The virus was first detected within the central Chinese language metropolis of Wuhan late final yr, resulting in the worldwide pandemic. Critics have accused Beijing of an preliminary cover-up try, though Trump himself has admitted to downplaying the severity of the virus as early as February.

China seems to have contained the virus inside its borders, reporting no new circumstances of home an infection in a month, whereas Hong Kong has additionally radically introduced down its numbers of recent circumstances.

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink

Google warns Australians could lose free search services

[ad_1]

Google has warned that the Australian government’s plans to make digital giants pay for news content threatens users’ free services in Australia and could hand users’ data to media organizations

CANBERRA, Australia —
Google warned on Monday that the Australian government’s plans to make digital giants pay for news content threatens users’ free services in Australia and could hand users’ data to media organizations.

The U.S.-based company’s warning, contained in what it called an “Open letter to Australians,” comes a week before public consultations close on Australian draft laws that would make both Google and Facebook pay for news siphoned from commercial media companies.

“A proposed law … would force us to provide you with a dramatically worse Google Search and YouTube, could lead to your data being handed over to big news businesses, and would put the free services you use at risk in Australia,” Google Australia and New Zealand managing director Mel Silva wrote.

Google owns YouTube, a video-sharing platform.

Both Google and Facebook have condemned the proposed legislation, which was released last month and aims to succeed where other countries have failed in making them compensate media businesses for news content.

Australian competition watchdog Rod Sims, chair of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, which drafted the laws, said Google’s letter “contains misinformation.”

“Google will not be required to charge Australians for the use of its free services such as Google Search and YouTube, unless it chooses to do so,” Sims said in a statement.

“Google will not be required to share any additional user data with Australian news businesses unless it chooses to do so,” he added.

Australian Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, the minister responsible for the consumer watchdog, said in a statement that the draft law “remains open for consultation, providing an opportunity for media companies and digital platforms to provide feedback” until Aug. 28.

Swinburne University senior lecturer on media Belinda Barnet described the Google letter as a “cynical exercise” designed to “scare Google users.”

“I see no merit in any of the arguments,” she said.

“One of the most ironic arguments is that they’re going to have to hand over some data to news organizations — for example which article people have read and how long they may have read it for — and this coming from the world’s major privacy violator and certainly the world’s largest data aggregator is a bit rich,” Barnet added.

Google has been battling the Australian consumer watchdog on two fronts. Last month, the watchdog launched court action against Google for allegedly misleading account holders about its use of their personal data.

The commission alleges that Google misled millions of Australians to obtain their consent and expand the scope of personal information that it collects about users’ internet activity to target advertising. Google denies the allegations.

[ad_2]

Source link

British MP who leads Kashmir group denied entry to India

[ad_1]

Indian officials have denied a British lawmaker entry after she landed at New Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport

NEW DELHI —
Indian officials denied a British lawmaker entry on Monday after she landed at New Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport, according to an accompanying aide.

Debbie Abrahams, a Labour Party Member of Parliament who chairs a parliamentary group focused on the disputed region of Kashmir, was unable to clear customs after the Indian visa she presented was rejected, the aide, Harpreet Upal, told The Associated Press.

Abrahams and Upal arrived at the airport on an Emirates flight from Dubai at 9 a.m. Abrahams said immigration officials did not cite any reason for denying her entry, but continued to shout that she didn’t have a visa.

The visa she showed at customs, a copy of which was shared with the AP, permitted her to “attend technical/business meetings,” and expired in October 2020.

A government official who requested anonymity because it was an immigration matter said the lawmaker wasn’t allowed to enter India because her visa wasn’t valid, information the official said she had already received “in another communication sent to her.”

Abrahams , 59, has been a member of Parliament since 2011 and was on a two-day personal trip to India, to be followed by a three-day trip to the portion of Kashmir that Pakistan controls.

After India won independence from British rule in 1947, the Himalayan region of Kashmir was split between India and the newly formed country of Pakistan. The archrivals have fought two wars over the territory, both claiming it in its entirety.

In a phone interview with AP while awaiting her return flight to the U.K., Abrahams said that she’d be trying to organize a visit to India-controlled Kashmir with the India High Commission in London since October, but had been unsuccessful. She had, however, received permission to visit Pakistan-controlled Kashmir, and was planning to fly to Islamabad later this week.

“It was implied to me that it was linked to that,” Abrahams said, referring to a conversation with officials at the U.K. High Commission in New Delhi.

“They were also aware of the trip to Pakistan. It looks as though politics is playing a part in this action,” she said.

Abrahams has been an outspoken critic of the Indian government’s move last August stripping Kashmir of its semi-autonomy and demoting it from a state to a federal territory.

Shortly after the changes to Kashmir’s status were passed by India’s Parliament, Abrahams wrote a letter to India’s High Commissioner to the U.K., saying the action “betrays the trust of the people” of Kashmir.

India took more than 20 foreign diplomats on a visit to Kashmir last week, the second such trip Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist government has organized in six months.

Access to the region remains tight, with no foreign journalists allowed.

In a statement, Abrahams related her ordeal in Delhi.

“I tried to establish why the visa had been revoked and if I could get a ‘visa on arrival’ but no one seemed to know,” she said. “Even the person who seemed to be in charge said he didn’t know and was really sorry about what had happened. So now I am just waiting to be deported … unless the Indian Government has a change of heart. I’m prepared to let the fact that I’ve been treated like a criminal go, and I hope they will let me visit my family and friends.”

[ad_2]

Source link

NCAA’s Emmert presses Senate for ‘guardrails’ on athlete pay

[ad_1]

NCAA President Mark Emmert is urging Congress to step in and put restrictions on college athletes’ ability to earn money from endorsements

WASHINGTON —
NCAA President Mark Emmert urged Congress to put restrictions on college athletes’ ability to earn money from endorsements, telling a Senate committee Tuesday federal action is needed to “maintain uniform standards in college sports” amid player-friendly laws approved in California and under consideration in other states.

The NCAA last fall said it would allow players to “benefit” from the use of their name, image and likeness and is working on new rules it plans to reveal in April. Under the NCAA’s timeline, athletes would be able to take advantage of endorsement opportunities beginning next January.

Meanwhile, more than 25 states are considering legislation that would force the NCAA to allow players to earn money off their personal brand in a bid to address inequities in the multi-billion-dollar college sports industry. California passed a law last year that gives broad endorsement rights to players and it will take effect in 2023. Other states could grant those rights as soon as this year.

The NCAA’s concern, echoed by Big 12 Commissioner Bob Bowlsby, who also testified Tuesday, is that endorsement deals for athletes would have a negative effect on recruiting, with schools and boosters in states with athlete-friendly laws using money to entice players to sign with certain schools.

“If implemented, these laws would give some schools an unfair recruiting advantage and open the door to sponsorship arrangements being used as a recruiting inducement. This would create a huge imbalance among schools and could lead to corruption in the recruiting process,” Emmert said. “We may need Congress’ support in helping maintain uniform standards in college sports.”

Emmert’s comments were similar to what the NCAA, the Big 12 and the Atlantic Coast Conference have been communicating to Congress through well-paid lobbyists. The Associated Press has found that the NCAA and the two conferences spent $750,000 last year lobbying on Capitol Hill, in part to amplify their concern that “guardrails” are needed on endorsement pay for athletes to avoid destroying college sports as we know it.

Sen. Jerry Moran, a Kansas Republican and the chairman of the Subcommittee on Manufacturing, Trade, and Consumer Protection, said he was not inclined to act until after the NCAA reveals its new rules.

“I wish Congress was in a position to be able to provide the NCAA and the athletes the opportunity to find a solution. … The ability for Congress to do that is, that’s a challenge,” Moran said in an interview after the hearing. “The next step is to see what the NCAA is capable of presenting to us in April.”

NCAA critics believe there is plenty of evidence that recruiting is already corrupt — pointing in part to the federal criminal case involving shoe companies paying basketball players to attend schools they sponsor — and that letting players earn endorsement money won’t create the major problems the NCAA predicts.

Ramogi Huma, executive director of the National College Players’ Association, which advocates for athletes’ rights, said under current NCAA rules, 99.3% of top-100 football recruits choose teams from the Power Five conferences.

“The power conferences have advantages and they consistently pull the best recruits,” Huma said. “They will continue to get the recruits. The reality is, you’re not going to change the recruiting by limiting the players’ opportunities.”

Huma said once states start granting players endorsement rights, Congress would not be inclined to take those rights away, “and we’ll have an opportunity to witness the fact that NCAA sports will still be strong and everybody will tune in.”

There was bipartisan agreement among the senators at the hearing that athletes should have access to endorsement opportunities and that some regulations are necessary.

Emmert did not fully escape lawmakers’ anger at the system he presides over.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican, excoriated Emmert for the NCAA’s handling of sexual violence against women. She also noted the case of James Wiseman, a top NBA prospect who left school after he was suspended over $11,500 given to his mother by Memphis coach Penny Hardaway to help with moving expenses. Hardaway gave the money before he was Memphis’ coach.

Blackburn said the NCAA’s lack of consistency and transparency in the Wiseman case had eroded trust in the organization’s ability to handle issues of player benefits.

“I think a question that must be going through a lot of minds of student-athletes and their parents is, how in the world are they going to be able to trust you to get this right?” Blackburn said.

———

Follow Ben Nuckols at https://twitter.com/APBenNuckols

———

More AP college sports: https://apnews.com/apf-sports and https://twitter.com/AP—Top25



[ad_2]

Source link

Pompeo in UK to talk Huawei, post-Brexit trade deal

[ad_1]

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo says the United States and Britain will retain and enhance their special relationship after the U.K.’s departure from the European Union this week

LONDON —
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Thursday that the U.S. and Britain would retain and enhance their special relationship once the U.K. leaves the European Union this week. He also said that American unhappiness with the British decision to allow the Chinese tech company Huawei to play a role in the country’s high-speed wireless network would not affect broader ties.

As President Donald Trump’s Senate impeachment trial neared a close in Washington, Pompeo met with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson to re-register American concerns about Huawei. But he stressed that he expected they could be addressed as more details emerge on what limits will be placed on the company and with advances in communications technology.

Pompeo played down concerns that Huawei’s presence in Britain’s 5G network would severely disrupt intelligence sharing within the so-called “Five Eyes” partnership of English-speaking nations that includes the U.S., Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

“That relationship is deep. It is strong, it will remain,” Pompeo said at an event with British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab before meeting Johnson. “I am confident that as we work together to figure out how to implement this decision that we’ll work to get this right.”

“We were trying to make the case, as we made the case with every country in the world, that we think putting Huawei technology anywhere in your system is very, very difficult to mitigate and therefore not worth the gamble,” he said.

“But as we move forward together to make sure that next generation of technology is right, is secure and operates a under a Western set of values and system, we’ll get to the right place,” Pompeo said.

The U.S. has been lobbying European allies to ban Huawei over concerns it could be compelled to help with electronic eavesdropping after Beijing enacted a 2017 national intelligence law. U.S. officials also worry that 5G networks would rely heavily on software, leaving them open to vulnerabilities, and have repeatedly warned they would have to reconsider intelligence sharing with allies that use Huawei. The company has denied the allegations.

On Tuesday, Britain decided to let Huawei have a limited role supplying new high-speed network equipment to wireless carriers, ignoring Washington’s warnings that it would sever intelligence sharing if the company wasn’t banned.

Britain’s decision was the first by a major U.S. ally in Europe, and follows intense lobbying from the Trump administration as the U.S. vies with China for technological dominance.

Huawei is not expected to greatly affect negotiations on a post-Brexit free trade deal that Britain is counting on after its divorce from the EU on Friday. Trump has pledged that the U.S. and Britain will negotiate a major free-trade deal as soon as Brexit is complete and officials have already begun discussions on the plan.

Pompeo said that the U.S. would put Britain “at the front of the line” in its trade relationships and that the Trump administration had great confidence in the British people as they move ahead outside of the EU framework. He said he expected U.S.-British trade ties to exponentially increase once Britain is freed from EU commercial restrictions.

Pompeo is in London on the first leg of a trip to Europe and Central Asia that will also take him to Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.

The centerpiece of the trip will be a two-day stop in Ukraine that begins later Thursday when Pompeo will become the most senior U.S. official to visit Kyiv and meet with President Volodymyr Zelenskiy since the impeachment process began last year.

Ukraine is at the center of the impeachment charges against Trump who is accused of obstructing Congress and abuse of office for withholding critical military aid to the country in exchange for an investigation into alleged corruption by the son of former Vice President Joe Biden, a political rival. Those allegations got a boost earlier this week when a manuscript of former national security adviser John Bolton’s upcoming book was revealed to echo the claim.

The Senate is expected to vote on hearing impeachment witnesses, including possibly Bolton, on Friday. Bolton maintains that Trump was in fact withholding the aid in exchange for a public pledge of a probe into Biden as witnesses testified before the House impeachment inquiry.

Ukraine has been delicate subject for Pompeo, who over the weekend lashed out at a National Public Radio reporter for asking questions about why he has not publicly defended the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, who was removed from her post early after unsubstantiated allegations were made against her by Trump’s personal attorney Rudolph Giuliani.

Pompeo has twice postponed earlier planned trips to Ukraine, most recently in early January when developments with Iran forced him to cancel. In Kyiv, Pompeo said he plans to discuss the issue of corruption but demurred when asked if he would specifically raise the Bidens or the energy company Burisma for which Hunter Biden worked.

“I don’t want to talk about particular individuals. It’s not worth it,” he told reporters aboard his plane to London. “It’s a long list in Ukraine of corrupt individuals and a long history there. And President Zelenskiy has told us he’s committed to it. The actions he’s taken so far demonstrate that, and I look forward to having a conversation about that with him as well.”

———

Follow AP’s full coverage of Brexit and British politics at: https://www.apnews.com/Brexit

[ad_2]

Source link

News flash from Florida legislators: Telegraph era is over

[ad_1]

Florida lawmakers are transmitting a news bulletin: The telegraph era is over

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. —
Florida lawmakers are transmitting a news bulletin: The telegraph era is over.

Before there was instant messaging, emails and even corded telephones, there was the reliable telegraph to instantaneously transmit messages far and wide. Now, people turn to the internet, text messaging, Twitter, gifs and emojis to write their long-distance notes.

While thumbing through a volume of Florida laws, state Rep. Tommy Gregory and a colleague came upon old statutes regulating the telegraph industry.

“I wondered if they were now obsolete,” said Gregory, a former lieutenant colonel in the Air Force.

“We probably haven’t sent a telegraph in the state of Florida in more than a decade,” Gregory said in an interview. Indeed, it’s anybody’s guess when that final Florida missive might have been tapped into the ether. Western Union, once a leading telegraph service provider, sent out its last telegram on Jan. 27, 2006.

Gregory considered the statutes useless in today’s era of smartphones and emails, and he moved to rip the laws out of the state’s books.

A state House committee on Wednesday agreed unanimously to repeal Chapter 363 of the Florida Statute in its entirety. One lawmaker cheekily registered his vote by using his fingers to tap into the dais as if using Morse Code.

Back in its day, the telegraph was cutting-edge technology. Until Samuel Morse invented his eponymous code and sent out the first message by telegraph in 1844, the Pony Express was still the speediest way to get a message from coast to coast.

“WHAT HATH GOD WROUGHT?” the first telegraph message asked.

For starters, fax machines, Twitter and Facebook.

Telegram companies were once common. During America’s wars, a telegram arriving at a family’s door was a thing to be dreaded, perhaps containing the news of a beloved service member’s death. Air travel and interstate highways later made mail delivery faster and cheaper. Then the corded telephone became ubiquitous. Fax machines also became common. More recently, email and the Internet allowed for instantaneous messaging.

These days, smartphones have become the go-to communications tool.

The Florida law was adopted more than a century ago and remained mostly unchanged since 1913.

It established penalties against telegraph companies that refused to transmit messages, making them liable for damages for mental anguish and physical suffering because of their failure to promptly and correctly transmit or deliver a telegram.

Based on their research, staffers concluded that “the provisions of chapter 363, F.S., are outdated and no longer applicable.”

Gregory, an anti-red tape Republican, said the matter might not be urgent, but not necessarily a trivial exercise.

“This is not health care. Right. This is not an in-depth and complex legislation,” he said.

“But I think we need to reduce the footprint of government.”

(STOP)

[ad_2]

Source link

Boeing papers show employees slid 737 Max problems past FAA

[ad_1]

Newly released Boeing documents show that company employees knew about problems with flight simulators for the now-grounded 737 Max jetliner and talked about misleading regulators

Boeing employees knew about problems with flight simulators for the now-grounded 737 Max and apparently tried to hide them from federal regulators, according to documents released Thursday.

In internal messages, Boeing employees talked about misleading regulators about problems with the simulators. In one exchange, an employee told a colleague they wouldn’t let their family ride on a 737 Max.

Boeing said the statements “raise questions about Boeing’s interactions with the FAA” in getting the simulators qualified. But said the company is confident that the machines work properly.

“These communications do not reflect the company we are and need to be, and they are completely unacceptable,” Boeing said in a statement.

Employees also groused about Boeing’s senior management, the company’s selection of low-cost suppliers, wasting money, and the Max.

“This airplane is designed by clowns who in turn are supervised by monkeys,” one employee wrote.

Names of the employees who wrote the emails and text messages were redacted.

The Max has been grounded worldwide since March, after two crashes that killed 346 people. Boeing is still working to update software and other systems on the plane to convince regulators to let it fly again. The work has taken much longer than Boeing expected.

The latest batch of internal Boeing documents were provided to the Federal Aviation Administration and Congress last month and released on Thursday. The company said it was considering disciplinary action against some employees.

An FAA spokesman said the agency found no new safety risks that have not already been identified as part of the FAA’s review of changes that Boeing is making to the plane. The spokesman, Lynn Lunsford, said the simulator mentioned in the documents has been checked three times in the last six months.

”Any potential safety deficiencies identified in the documents have been addressed,” he said in a statement.

A lawmaker leading one of the congressional investigations into Boeing called them “incredibly damning.”

“They paint a deeply disturbing picture of the lengths Boeing was apparently willing to go to in order to evade scrutiny from regulators, flight crews, and the flying public, even as its own employees were sounding alarms internally,” said Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., chairman of the House Transportation Committee.

DeFazio said the documents detail “some of the earliest and most fundamental errors in the decisions that went into the fatally flawed aircraft.” DeFazio and other critics have accused the company of putting profit over safety.

The grounding of the Max will cost the company billions in compensation to families of passengers killed in the crashes and airlines that canceled thousands of flights. Last month, the company ousted its CEO and decided to temporarily halt production of the plane in mid-January, a decision that is rippling out through its supplier network.

[ad_2]

Source link