Sentence of the Supreme Court on the seizure action of vehicles, rights of collector

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has made an important order on the seizure of vehicles involved in illegal activities or crimes. The Madhya Pradesh High Court canceled the power of the collector to seize the vehicles that seized the transport of illegal drinks. Now only the trial court in question will be able to order to seize such vehicles. Article 47 of the 1915 Excise Act is unconstitutional. A bank of three judges of Chief Justice Suresh Kumar Kait, Justice Sushruta Arind Dharmadhikari and Justice Vivek Jain declared Article 47-an unconstitutional of the Madhya Pradesh-Axyza Act 1915. Under this section, the collector had the right to seize the vehicles in the action matters. This order was given regarding the cow -resistant law. The court also made it clear that the collector could seize the vehicle only when the trial court is convicted under the law at the battle of the cow. This decision comes on petitions submitted by the resident of Sagar, Rajesh Vishwakarma and the resident of Narsinghpur, Ramlal Jharia. Both petitions argued that the vehicle was abused many times without the information of the owner and the vehicle being damaged by standing in the police station due to the long trial process, causing the innocent owner to great losses. The court also applied this order to all cases in which the seizure proceedings have not yet begun, or in which appeal or revision in the Supreme Court is pending. What is the seizure process? Seizure means to declare the property (eg vehicle or equipment) used in a crime or be seized by the government as a government property. If a person or organization is convicted of a crime, the government may confiscate that property and declare the property of the government. It is called politics. According to a report, if a vehicle is used in cases of illegal mineral mining or illegal liquor transport, etc., the government may take up the vehicle. Share this story -tags