Tag Archives: Sexual and reproductive health

French conservatives protest invoice permitting IVF for lesbians

[ad_1]

Conservative activists marched by Paris on Sunday to protest a French invoice that will give lesbian {couples} and single ladies entry to in vitro fertilization and associated procedures.

Conventional Catholic teams and far-right activists who held mass demonstrations in opposition to France’s legalization of homosexual marriage in 2013 organized the protest, arguing that it deprives youngsters of the proper to a father.

LGBT activists and left-wing teams held a counter-demonstration in opposition to them.

Police blocked off a number of streets in Paris to forestall violence between the 2 teams.

A number of different nations already supply assisted copy to lesbians and single ladies however French regulation at the moment permits it just for infertile heterosexual {couples}.

The invoice is a part of a broader bioethics draft regulation below debate on the Nationwide Meeting. France’s well being care system would cowl the price of the procedures for all ladies below 43.

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink

Examine finds air air pollution reaches placenta throughout being pregnant

[ad_1]

A brand new research suggests when a pregnant lady breathes in air air pollution, it will probably journey past her lungs to the placenta that guards her fetus.

Air pollution composed of tiny particles from automobile exhaust, manufacturing unit smokestacks and different sources is harmful to everybody’s well being, and through being pregnant it has been linked to untimely births and low beginning weight. However scientists do not perceive why, one thing that might have an effect on care for girls in extremely polluted areas. One idea is that the particles lodge in mother’s lungs and set off doubtlessly dangerous irritation.

Tuesday, Belgian researchers reported one other chance, that any danger is likely to be extra direct.

A novel scanning approach noticed a kind of particle air pollution — sootlike black carbon — on placentas donated by 28 new moms, they reported in Nature Communications.

The placenta nourishes a growing fetus and tries to dam damaging substances within the mom’s bloodstream. The Hasselt College workforce discovered the particles amassed on the aspect of the placenta closest to the fetus, close to the place the umbilical wire emerges.

That is not proof the soot truly crossed the placenta to achieve the fetus — or that it is liable for any ailing results, cautioned Dr. Yoel Sadovsky of the College of Pittsburgh Medical Middle, a number one placenta professional who wasn’t concerned with the brand new analysis.

And it is a small research.

Nonetheless, “simply discovering it on the placenta is vital,” Sadovsky stated. “The following query can be how a lot of those black carbon particles must be there to trigger harm.”

Scientists already had some clues from animal research that particles might attain the placenta, however Tuesday’s research is a primary with human placentas. The Belgian researchers developed a approach to scan placenta samples utilizing ultra-short pulses from a laser that made the black carbon particles flash a brilliant white mild, so that they may very well be measured.

The researchers included placentas from 10 moms who lived in areas with excessive air pollution and 10 others from low areas. The upper the publicity to air pollution, the extra particles the researchers counted within the placentas.

“Because the fetal organs are below full improvement, this may need some well being dangers,” stated Hasselt atmosphere and public well being specialist Tim Nawrot, the research’s senior writer. He’s doing further analysis to attempt to inform.

———

The Related Press Well being and Science Division receives assist from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Division of Science Training. The AP is solely liable for all content material. 

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink

Couple claims clinic implanted their embryo in wrong woman

[ad_1]

A Southern California couple is suing a fertility clinic, claiming their embryo was mistakenly implanted in a New York woman, who gave birth to their son as well as a second boy belonging to another couple.

The lawsuit by Anni and Ashot Manukyan describes an alleged in vitro fertilization mix-up by CHA Fertility Center in Los Angeles that involves three separate couples.

“What Anni and Ashot discovered, much to their horror, was that their son had been stolen from them when he was still an embryo and implanted into a stranger that later became his birth mother,” claims the suit filed Wednesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

The birth mother in New York believed she was carrying twins made from her and her husband’s genetic material, the suit says.

Genetic testing confirmed the two infants were not related to the couple and were not related to each other.

The Queens woman and her husband filed a separate medical malpractice and negligence lawsuit in federal court in Brooklyn last week.

The Manukyans, of Glendale, California, endured a court fight before being granted custody of their son, according to the court filing. They are seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.

“CHA put three families through a living hell, and our lives will never be the same,” Ashot Manukyan said in a statement. “We fought to get our boy back and now we will fight to make sure this never happens again.”

CHA officials did not respond to emails seeking comment. An attorney for the clinic could not be found.

In addition, Anni Manukyan was mistakenly implanted with at least one embryo of a stranger, when she thought the embryo resulted from her and her husband’s genetic material, according to the lawsuit. That implantation did not result in a successful pregnancy, the court papers say.

It’s unclear from the lawsuits who the third couple is or what happened to the other boy.

The Los Angeles lawsuit also alleges the clinic violated a California law that bars knowingly using “sperm, ova, or embryos in assisted reproduction technology, for any purpose other than that indicated by the sperm, ova, or embryo provider’s signature on a written consent form.”

[ad_2]

Source link