Yusril explains the requirements for the transfer of prisoners between countries that will be regulated by law

Jakarta – The Government is discussing the Draft Act (RUU) regarding the transfers of international prisoners. Coordinating Minister of Law, Human Rights, Immigration and Correctional (Kumham Imipas), Yusril Ihza Mahendra, said that one of the things regulated by law was the condition of transferring prisoners between countries. “In this way, the law regulates the procedures, conditions regarding the transfer of prisoners. But the implementation is based on a request,” Yusril said Tuesday (8/19/2025) in Central Jakarta. He said the request would be reviewed by the Indonesian government. He said there were a number of conditions that would be regulated by law. The first scroll of continuing with content “is a consideration of humanity and secondly is a consideration of good relations with the country concerned and how long the person has served a criminal (Indonesia). He said the transfer could only be done if the legal status of the prisoners was Inkrah. He said there was an extradition for foreign citizens who were still in the legal process. “There was a decision on the court in Inkrah. If there is no court decision, it may not. If it is in the process of investigations, it can be withdrawn correctly. It is only the one convicted, there is an inkrah decision,” he said. “And we must also hear the considerations of BNN, considerations of the police and others. And because it involves cross -administrations,” he continued. The removal and exchange of prisoners between countries is also included in the convicted convicted death. He said the convicted convicted person could be moved if it was not executed. “Actually, if the death of death is carried out, it does not have to be moved, the person is dead. But now people who have been sentenced to death, but are not executed. Well, in accordance with the changes in our penalty code, the execution of the death sentence is not easy to implement. Another requirement that should not be the two countries.” Here it is considered a crime, and in the country in question it is also considered a crime. It can only be moved. If here is considered a crime, there is no, and vice versa, it cannot be moved. So the case of people gathering Kebo can be found guilty here. (HAF/HAF)