The expected cryptocurrency bubble is driven by political considerations

US President Donald Trump is known for his love for President William McKinley, who ruled the United States in the nineteenth century, which is credited to the improvement of the US economy “by drawing up customs tariffs and taking advantage of human skills”, and currently there is an ‘other common point’ that combines Trump and Makinley. Current Currency Reserves: A new idea with unclear effects of the National Reserve of Encrypted Currencies that Trump proposed, which includes training and Solana, is an important platform for the launch of satirical cryptocurrencies (MIM coin), reminiscent of the struggle to support a monetary system. The current threat in the appearance of a bubble in encrypted currencies could threaten the US dollar, with the possibility of customs definitions such as what happened in the McKinley era, increasing economic pressure. The formation of coded currencies is a new and unprecedented idea at state level, as well as the United States, and Trump has not accurately explained the details. However, its statements exceed the construction of a stock of formation or to keep $ 17 billion in the value of encrypted currencies that confiscated US authorities. His explicit reference to other encrypted currencies, such as Ripple, indicates unprecedented purchases from the government of highly volatile digital assets subject to organizational investigation. It is an anxious precedent in itself. In addition to the risk of loss, the Trump family has an interest in success of encrypted currencies – including Trump’s encrypted currency based on Bluechen Solana – and would raise concerns about fraud and corruption. Politization of Monetary Issues: Lessons from the nineteenth century, but there are broader consequences that extend to the politicization of popular critical obsession in the nineties of the nineteenth century. (What is happening today can be a repetition of a previous history seen that a similar politicization of financial issues was). At the time, “Silver Ansar” – and they were farmers suffering from debt due to the decline in crop prices – was dissatisfied with the conversion of the United States after accepting gold as a cash standard, as the only commodity accepted against the dollar, and was claimed to return to mineral dualism. (Gold and silver together as the basis for the value of the dollar, instead of gold). The controversy over its stable money in its value was bitter, just like any noisy discussion on the cryptocurrency during the thanksgiving dinner. The gold supporters, who regard it as a criterion for financial integrity, have those who hope to reduce their debt by half by paying them with an abundant silver. It is said to have an inspiration to the story of ‘Wizard or’ (oz symbolizes the grams) and its yellow brick road with reference to the Gold Standard. Just as the pressure groups that supported the encrypted currencies, and their enthusiastic supporters paved the way for Trump to support the support of training during his election campaign, the regime of the metal (the use of gold and silver together as a critical standard) became a prominent popular problem during the Machini election campaign. Silver supporters were the ancestors of the ‘Make America Great Movement Again’, according to economist Robert Schiller, because they supported ‘enthusiastic American nationalism’ and also because the ruling institution looked at them with contempt. After a supporting speech to use silver delivered by his Democratic opponent (William Jennings Brian), McKinley reached the power and promised the ‘serious effort’ to adopt a system of mineral worldwide; It is an idea that was promising to have a sense of injustice because it was complicated enough to look ‘popular’. The agreements with the current situation indicate that Trump’s reserves, if it becomes a reality, can create a narrative of major consequences. (Economic or political). The political blessing represented by the purchase of encrypted symbols – as well as the US government’s purchase of silver in 1890 – can give the market a new legitimacy as a financial alternative, whether or not it is an economic justification. The economic risks of cryptocurrencies, while we are still far from the statement of cryptocurrencies as a legitimate currency, the presence of financial support from taxpayers (government) in digital asset markets will make much more stable and attractive to investors. This brings in more risks and fluctuations, and it can increase economic inequality as the fluctuation of Trump’s prices or the Lieberra -Digital currency associated with Javier Millie is an indication of this. This kind of political bubble backed by politicians will eventually be an important test of the US dollar, which McKinley has connected to the Gold Standard- until his successor after a long time Richard Nixon has the ability to transform it and re-establish the global financial system. The implicit message Trump sends to people to sell their US origin and buy cryptocurrencies is a risk -trained message, as the economy is experiencing pressure from upcoming customs tariffs and what Ray Dalio calls a threatening heart attack caused by high debt. This will be a test of the Greasham Act, which states that “poor money expelled good money from the trade.” We hope it will never happen, otherwise it will look closer to an old financial model rather than a development to the future.