Faizabad about the statement of Khurshid, the Holy One, said Paramahansa Das said Rahul could be committed, comparison could be wrong

On the statement by Uttar Pradesh News Desk Salman Khurshid, there is also a boiling point among the saints of Ayodhya, in which he compared Rahul Gandhi to Lord Ram. The saints of Ramjanmabhoomi challenged this statement in strong words and challenged them. The ascetic Canton godHadhishwar Jagatguru Paramhansa Acharya said that Rahul Gandhi, who once found Lord Ram fictitious, the congress that has always been trapped in the construction of the ram -temple, where was the sudden dedication born in Congress who rejected the existence of Lord Shri Ram. If Rahul Gandhi is to be made, you must become a dedicated, Ram cannot be a dedicated. During the journey of India, Rahul got to know that power cannot be reached without Rama, therefore Congress connects himself to Rama in this way. If you have courage, then compare the prophet Raju Das, there, Mahant Raju Das, who is related to Hanuman Garhi, said Narayan cannot be compared to the male. Rahul’s dedication to Ram is good, but the statement of Salman Khurshid is wrong. Rahul Gandhi Congress used to create an army of advocates in protest against Lord Ram. Are used to raise questions about Ram’s essence. Rahul came to Ayodhya, but never came to Ramjanmabhoomi, now the temple temple is running. His dedication is good, but comparison is wrong. My opposition is, if Salman Khurshid dares, then compares his prophet to Rahul, why are you doing it to Lord Ram? Faizabad News Desk shares this story