Maki -Criticism on super supervision bad after 3 judges have become a bribery suspect

Jakarta – The Indonesian Anti Corruption Association (MAKI) has criticized the Supreme Court (MA) after the case of judges and clerk caught in bribery on the judgment or loose decisions in the corruption case of the export of raw materials for cooking oil. Maki assesses that supervision of the Supreme Court is bad. ‘Supreme Court’s supervision system is very bad, because it is in fact just a broken Jakarta, even South Jakarta, Central -Jakarta, because it is the corruption of the series in the center, it appears that the judges are part of South Jakarta,’ Coordinator Maki Boyamin Saiman, told report on Monday (4/14/2025). Boyamin said the cases that the Supreme Court and judicial officials decorated in the Surabaya District Court (PN) and the Central Jakarta Corruption Court have not yet made the Supreme Court look effectively. Boyamin also claimed to be disappointed. Browse to continue with the content “So yes, we are disappointed that Mom could not reform him, where there are still many people who are tempted. In reality, in my opinion it asked to be tempted, not just in temptation. Because it was very big money and that it was in the regulatory position. He asked the Supreme Court to open as widely as possible to the Supervised Judicial Commission (KY). Boyamin wants Ky to be able to oversee the Supreme Court as a whole, which means it is not limited to overseeing the judge’s behavior under the Supreme Court. “This is what the Supreme Court must make to reveal KY to judge the whole, the whole, not only behavior, but also decisions, and there are allegations of irregularities, together,” Boyamin said. “Mom should not close himself, the reason is that the supervisory body has been monitored. It is a form of closure of himself, in my opinion, who does not want to clean up, does not want to improve themselves. So yes, you have to make yourself against Ky,” he added. Previously, the chairman of the South Jakarta District Court, Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, was named a suspect related to the bribery case of dealing with cases in the Central Jakarta District Court. In addition, there were also 3 judges, as well as the young clerk at the North Jakarta District Court and the lawyer who was also nominated as a suspect in this case. Cases of bribery and satisfaction are related to the judgment of the unstague or loose decisions in the case of corruption in the export of raw materials for cooking oil. At the time, the panel of judges gave a loose decision to the corporate defendant. The three judges were Judge Agam Syarif Baharudin, Judge Ali Muhtaro and Judge Djuyamto. The three allegedly received a bribe worth RP 22.5 billion for the freelance sentence. The three judges, along with Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, compiled as chair of the South Jakarta District Court; Marcella Santoso and Ariyanto as advocates; As well as the young registrar at the North Jakarta District Court, Wahyu Gunawan. (FAS/IDN) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here