The accumulation of the wealth of artificial intelligence billionaires appears as a new bright era

After a few decades of technological wealth that have caused tremendous changes, the prosperity of artificial intelligence proclaims with another revival. The increase in the assessment of the company “Invidia” was not only limited to the co -worker for her Jensen Huang a very rich man, but also the wealth of his cousin Lisa SOO, the president of “Advanced Micro Devices”, was not limited to $ 1.2 billion. The quick look at the ten richest people in the world shows that the leaders of the technological sector, from Elon Musk to Bill Gates, are still at the top. 5 rich people have half a trillion dollars looking for the future of artificial intelligence, one of the positive ways to look at this mutation in wealth based on the fact that the capital flows into an innovative field that can benefit everyone in the end. If the optimistic about artificial intelligence was right, and we are on the threshold of a new industrial revolution -or a ‘turning point’, as Huang described it, after the results of ‘Invidia’ have shattered the market expectations -will further extend the profit of productivity and economic growth than the billionaires. The original version of the eighteenth century of the industrial revolution, such as the inventor, Richard Arkrit, who helped his innovation of a cotton spin machine that works with the birth of the modern world and at the same time made him a rich person. We do not want to repeat the loss of work and terrible working conditions caused by manufacturing, but there are ways to deal with these disorders. The monopolies and corruption of the “learning”. As for the least positive view, you see that this era looks increasingly like the ‘sect of the sect’ for monopolies that control everything, such as’ standard oil ‘founded by John de Rockefeller, and that Arkrit’s counterparts are not an amateur vinder in their garage, but that they work next to or within the most important technology companies, which are already a’ which is already dominated, which is already dominated, which is already dominated ‘DuPonts’ businesses a century ago. The wealth of the heads of the massive technology companies rises parallel to the increase in barriers before the entry of new competitors, or these obstacles are the cost of obtaining the same artificial intelligence models or the electronic chips they occupy (such as Entepia chips), of which prices have been multiplied since 2020, and two colleague Parmy Olson. “Google” and “Microsoft” will dominate artificial intelligence with high costs, and as the twentieth century also showed, excessive market power can lead to collusion and corruption that drives competitors out of the market, and shows workers’ decline, and organizational authorities are without fangs -who want to see in the first and second century. Even if you think that the capabilities of artificial intelligence can double economic growth rates, similar to the IT revolution for a decade (which means in a country like France, and $ 500 billion ($ 540 billion) to gross domestic product to 2034, according to economist Philip Aguon), the reality can be less than -Companies are banned. A document of artificial intelligence, and therefore it is necessary for the anti -monopoly authorities to monitor the current artificial intelligence revolution and monitor a document; Especially in Europe, where it appears for the first time in new competitors in the field of technology. In a discussion recently attended by the European Parliament, Margaret Vistagger, the first official of the fight against monopoly in the European Union, warned that the current rabbit to finance artificial intelligence is feeding the most important companies that a nest existing environmental systems “instead of promising. The warning may look too early for some. Ultimately, the currently paid artificial intelligence enterprises are not necessary, investors have assumed a wrong assumption during the ‘dotcom’ boom that the Internet telecommunications companies such as the Vodafone group have dominated the market forever (which unless it happens). The expansion of the company itself does not always express the abuse of hegemony in the market. Digital competition expert Christophe Karugate says that there are indirect positive results from the presence of large and successful companies that perform their activity in integrity, which stems from the nature of the economy of size and the scope of activity. The organizational bodies responsible for combating monopoly are more active today and advanced to intervention compared to what they were in the past. Amazon recently canceled plans to obtain the Irobot business, ‘Irobot’ manufacturer of the ‘Roba’ electric vacuum cleaner, due to competitive problems. The European Union has already begun to investigate the dominance of “Envenia” to provide artificial intelligence chips. Keep care and look, but we have to be more careful. For example, some bottlenecks, such as access to very important training data, may show an unfair competitive advantage from which existing businesses benefit. Microsoft is likely to have the ability to access a large amount of data through operating systems, the computer infrastructure and its GitHub codes. This is one of the reasons its $ 10 billion investment earns “Oben Ai” company, although it is not technically a merger, it deserves more carefully. The NGO (Article 19) recently recommended the regulatory bodies in the European Union, given beyond the “disabled contractual conditions carefully” and knows how the partnership really works in practice. The threat of punishing the behavior that disrupts competition also needs creativity. Over the years, European organizational bodies have fined the most important technology companies with billions of rands, but the irony is that it may have established their dominance; The most important companies can pay the fines immediately, while the smaller competitive companies cannot do so. The European Union is on its way to laying a fine on ‘Apple’ with $ 540 million, the new regulatory regulations, such as the AI ​​Act or the Digital Markets Act, are accompanied by fines exceeding fines, such as exposure to the business or forced to participate in data with competitors. This last penalty will be the same in the spirit of the 1956 approval decision, which forced the company “AT&T/Bell” (AT&T/Bell) into a patent license without a royalty, or for the eighteenth -century legal appeal against Arkrite, which was witness to the abolition of his patents. Entrepreneurs must feel the freedom to bring wealth out of their ideas, but the regulators must also impose equality and equal opportunities. And if that means giving more resources, let it be, as suggested Tobias Har, the general adviser of the company “Alph Alpha” recently in Brussels, when he said, we may need to rename the rules of anti -monopoly to the rules of “protecting democracy” to emphasize its importance. It can make society quieter and comfortable when the next artificial intelligence billionaire appears.