The European Union approves the most comprehensive Artificial Intelligence Act
The European Union takes the most comprehensive protection barriers to the world of rapidly developed artificial intelligence, after the Parliament of the Block on Wednesday approved the AI Act. It is possible to determine the group of historical new rules, especially in the absence of any United States legislation, the method of managing artificial intelligence in the West. But the approval of the legislation comes at a time when businesses are concerned that the law is exaggerated, while digital governing bodies say it is still limited. “Europe is worthy of global standards in the field of artificial intelligence.” This legislation will become legally after the member states have signed it, which is usually a formal action, and once it is published in the official Government Gazette of the European Union. The objectives of the law The new law aims to address the concerns of prejudice, privacy and other risks caused by rapidly developed technology. Legislation will prohibit the use of artificial intelligence from detecting feelings in the workplace and schools, as well as reducing how to use them in high -risk situations, such as sorting job requests. It will also place the first restrictions on the tools of obstetric intelligence, which acquired the world’s interest last year thanks to the popularity of “chatgpt”. Also read: Ai Insanity is pushing China investors to buy ‘Foxconn’ shares, but the draft law expressed concern in the three months that followed officials of the officials of a temporary agreement after a marathon negotiation session that lasted more than 35 hours. Germany and France withdrew, and with the talk of talks with the final station last year, the French and German governments fell against some of the most striking ideas to organize the obstetricy intelligence, on the pretext that the rules of emerging European companies such as the ‘Mestral’ French artificial intelligence and the German ‘thousand’ Groups of civil society such as the ‘European Enterprises’ (CEO) have expressed concern about the impact of major technology companies and European companies on the formulation of the final text. “This monochrome effect means that the artificial intelligence of general purposes is largely exempt from the bases, and it was only necessary to meet the obligations of transparency.” The latest announcement of the “mistral” partnership with Microsoft has caused the fear of some lawmakers. This step was strategically smart and “maybe essential” for the emerging French company, but he said, “The European legislature was played again.” Also read: “TSMC” restores its position among the top 10 valuable businesses in the world, while Brando Benevi, the legislature and the lead author of the law, said that the results speak, and added at a press conference on Wednesday, “the legislation determines the safety needs of the strongest models with clear criteria, so it is clear that we are on our feet.” The fear of influence on competitiveness, and US and European companies, has caused the fear to limit the competitiveness of the mass. “In light of the limited digital technology industry, relatively low investment is compared to the spoil of the industry such as the United States and China, with the pursuit of the European Union in technological sovereignty and the leadership of artificial intelligence,” says Raluka Sernatone, a researcher at the Carnegie European Research Center. The lawmakers acknowledged during a discussion Tuesday that there is still a wonderful job awaiting them. The European Union therefore plans to create an artificial intelligence office, an independent body within the European Commission. In practical terms, the office will be the most important port, with the ability to seek information from businesses that develop obstetrician artificial intelligence, and perhaps prohibit the system from working in the mass. Also read: Critical thinking is the best tactic to fight deep forgery, and Dragos Tudorach, a member of the European Parliament who was also one of the most important writers of the law, said that “the rules we approved to regulate the digital field – and not just the law of artificial intelligence – is an excellent and leading rule,” but to change the future of the future. digital work. a test.