Trial in the Supreme Court in the appointment of the high school teachers, objecting to the applicants' merit list continues in the Supreme Court regarding the appointments of high school teachers.

Several petitions contaminated by the state level merit list of the appointment of high school teachers in the Court of Justice Deepak Roshan of the Jharkhand High Court were heard on Thursday. 252 petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court in which the merit list is challenged. In the affidavit filed by the state government, it was said to be a protest march on the number of posts. State Bureau, Ranchi. Several petitions contaminated by the state level merit list of the appointment of high school teachers in the Court of Justice Deepak Roshan of the Jharkhand High Court were heard on Thursday. The trial could not be completed, even after the debate that lasted about five hours. The court ordered on Friday to continue the hearing in the case. 252 petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court in which the merit list is challenged. During the hearing, Preferred Advocate Ajit Kumar and Advocate Tejaswita success told the court that the affidavit filed by the State Government has a protest march on the number of posts. In the case of Soni Kumari of the Supreme Court, 425 candidates were ordered to be appointed. According to the state government, 377 candidates contributed to this. In such a situation, how of a thousand candidates were appointed under the command of Soni Kumari? It is also wrong from the government to say that the Supreme Court also protected the recommended names for appointment in the case of Soni Kumari. The applicants said that the Supreme Court order was not properly followed in the preparation of the merit list. There are many errors in the list. The court ordered JSSC officials to verify it. JSSC officials were also present in court during the hearing. During this time, a tablet card was offered by the government. Which includes the written number of applicants, names, subjects, categories, points, category of applicants, points of final selected candidates, the date of appointment and full information from the candidates to be secured by the Supreme Court order. JSSC was hosted by Advocate General Rajiv Ranjan, Sanjay Piparwal and Prince Kumar Singh. During the last hearing, the court said that the appointment was recommended according to the state way of merit. The declaration of the applicants is wrong that the appointment of the applicant is more than the final selected candidate in the state way of merit. The score of all applicants is less than the final candidate selected for the state way of merit so that they are not appointed. Please tell that petitions have been filed on behalf of Mena Kumari and others in the Supreme Court. It is said that there is an error in the merits of the state level issued for the appointment of high school teacher in the year 2016. Those who get fewer points from them were appointed as high school teachers.