In the case of Chase, the victim questioned the appointment of Barala as Assistant Attorney General

In the case of the alleged chase of 2017, complainant Varnika Kundu, the appointment of Vikas, the son of BJP’s Rajya Sabha-LP Subhash Barala as Assistant Advocate-General (AAG) in Haryana, questioned it as a ‘reflection’ of values, while the BJP kept a well-known silen. Renu Bhatia, chairman of the National Commission for Women of Haryana, told ‘The Tribune’ that ‘the party has all the information. This is the party’s decision. ‘ In the case of alleged chase and attempt to kidnap 2017 against Vikas Barala, daughter of a former IAS officer and kidnapping attempt, Varnika said in a statement about her Instagram account: “The appointment of someone in the public position is not just a political decision -this is a reflection of values and norms. For Indian citizens, she responded to the appointment of development last week. Must work morally. Although the BJP does not openly accept that there is something wrong in this appointment, the government must be kept away from the government. Development. If they meet and select the criteria, there is no reason to deprive them of the post of Aag. Given the ongoing case, it is a matter of morality, although it has not yet been found. The appointment can be avoided. “Two other party leaders say it was a ‘avoided dispute’ and top leaders of the party should consider being involved.” A leader said, “the BJP, under pressure in his second term, refused to remove the then Minister of State Sandeep Singh from the post because he was accused of alleged harassment. Similarly, head of state Mohan Lal Badoli is involved in a case of alleged gang rape, but remains the head of the government unit. The Aadhaar is the same – they did not appear to be guilty of being guilty. “Meanwhile, the chief minister’s media in -Charge Parveen Attri justified the name of the name, saying: ‘Everything was done under the rules. No provision has been violated. Those who live in politics are accused. As long as the court is accused them, we can’t say anything, we can’t say anything. If the court found them not guilty while making the verdict, it would be impossible to refuse them today. ‘