Mark Sareits, the British deputy, launched the northern city of Leeds, which he described as the first model of deputy artificial intelligence. Once the project announced the project, the criticism poured out. The users of the “X” platform attacked him as “lazy” and considered the project “horrible”. As for the press, it mocked his ‘strange’ and ‘reluctant’ robot and noticed that he couldn’t understand the Leeds accent. In fact, most politicians evade questions with automatic answers, and many of them cannot understand the heavy accent of North England. In one case, a “guardian” journalist asked the robot: “Ibn Jari closed the back corridor with an old bank and did not intend to remove it.” The response to artificial intelligence advised to contact the police to report an abandoned vehicle, which is a better answer than I would have suggested to myself. Artificial intelligence increases the competence of the 35 -year -old Labor Party, a pioneer in the use of artificial intelligence to improve the effectiveness of his duties. An increasing number of people use artificial intelligence to create digital copies of themselves for the purpose of working wider. Even the right activist Dave Rubin has a digital version of his YouTube program while spending a holiday this month. There is no doubt that this use has clear costs, from the erosion of credibility to the decline in the quality of services. But the benefits should not be overlooked, especially in cases where individuals do not have resources, as chat robots provide a new way to communicate, although some come from a gloomy future. Also read: “GPT-5” did not fully overcome its anxious problem. But a spokeswoman for the Swords says the new chat robot is “an addition” to the media available to him, such as e -mail and sound post, and it seems that this US is logical and useful to take advantage of the capabilities of artificial intelligence. An additional job and his income for those who drive money out of their experiences offers digital versions a way to expand their business. Brody Sharp, a physiotherapist in the Australian city of Melbourne, has a pioneering feeling. After sustaining a chronic injury caused by running, he began treating others with the same condition, and recorded 157 episodes of podcasts titled “Overcoming the Posterior Muscle Tendon inflammation at the top of the DY” to explain the problem and attract new clients. About a year ago, he paid the developer of two thousand Australian dollars (about 1300 dollars) to train a chat robot on podcasts and academic research on the injury, and then announced to the listeners that they could reach ‘custom advice’ of the new Smart Assistant for $ 8.99 a month. Look also: Artificial intelligence not only lies … but tampering with your personal memory over the past year, about 50 people participated in the service and asked the robot questions that vary between the benefits of cylinder exercises to train half a marathon with the injury. Sharp says the assistant earns an extra monthly revenue of $ 650, and that only $ 20 was spent on its operation during the year after covering the initial development costs. It is true that this income is not a wealth, but the side project can grow later. Human experiences of the rich only? Sharp plans in the future to train the robot on the advice he offers to his clients during the “zoom” sessions. What if the robot gives an unacceptable advice? “I have no objection,” he says, adding that the robot is designed to reflect more high quality than it represents his personal opinion. “Everything issued must be of high quality.” But there is a thin thread that separates the innovative and exaggerated leadership. Last year, Debak Chopra introduced a digital version of himself for a few dollars for use, and given that he composed 95 books and owned a global brand and a great wealth, his project seems less innovative and more interested in endless expansion. There is also Karen Marguri, one of the influences of “Snapchat”, who became a millionaire at the age of 24 after launching a robot that received one dollar per minute. Over time, the rich people may only become those who have the concession to talk to human experts, while the rest handles their artificial copies. However, it cannot be denied that the world has become addicted to chat robots. More than 700 million people use ‘chat BT’ per week, and the total number is likely to be more than one billion people if we count those who use artificial intelligence help from ‘Google’ and ‘Meta’. Since people are used to talking to machines, it will not be surprising that some will take a way to achieve the experiences of others. It can expand the extent of knowledge and alleviate the burdens if well. In the case of abuse, we will see more interactions that are nothing more than a cheap tradition.
There is an opportunity to clone you with artificial intelligence … Why don’t you try?
