The strict remarks of the Delhi High Court: Action must be done on unauthorized construction, but not raising the court by abuse of the Supreme Court in NCR Delhi on unauthorized construction not allowed

The Delhi High Court, while taking a difficult stand against unauthorized construction, said the court could not be used for extortion. The court, while hearing a petition to stop illegal construction in Jamia Nagar, questioned the relations with the property’s property. The MCD was instructed to continue the action and the DCP was ordered to investigate separate petitions. Jagran correspondent, New -Delhi. At the petition to take steps against unauthorized builders, Delhi High Court said the court could not be used to enforce money from those who make unauthorized constructions in Delhi. A Bench of Justice Mini Pushkaran said strict steps should be taken against unauthorized construction, but this court cannot be used to enforce money from such builders. This is clearly abused of the court’s process. Three people filed the petition, the court made the said comment on the petition of three persons related to the demand to direct and demolish the illegal and unauthorized construction made by three people on one property in Jamia Nagar Nagar area. The bank noted that the file is a resident of Amroa instead of Delhi and has any concerns and concerns about the area. The court also found that petitions were submitted by three different people for the same property. Also read: The man has the right to compensate for the allegations the woman made, the court issued a demolition order to remove the woman’s wife. During the hearing, the Municipal Corporation (MCD) argued that the demolition order was issued after issuing a notice on the case. Thereafter, partial demolition action was done on July 10 and further action was scheduled on September 4. At the same time, the Special Task Force (STF) argued that there are many cases before the Supreme Court, in which petitions have been submitted by people who do not live in that area and do not have a connection with the property. Also Reading- Atati and Sanjay Singh notice HC about Sandeep Dixit’s petition in defamation case, false allegations have been made! How the separate petitions were filed by the court noted that no one appeared on behalf of the petition when the order was approved, while the case was heard for some time before the order was accepted. With the facts on record, the bank said the MCD is already acting against the unauthorized construction in the various property, but such petitions cannot be justified for the purpose of repairing people by violently by repelling people in relation to unauthorized construction. At the same time, the court ordered the DCP in question to investigate how different petitions are submitted by different persons with regard to the same property. Also read comments on the Supreme Court on water crisis do not say the violation of life rights of clean water