The ruling of 'Sharia Court' and 'Darul Kaza' is not legal recognition: Supreme Court

New -Delhi, April 28 (IANS). The Supreme Court reiterated in an important ruling that no body such as ‘Kazi Ki Adalat’, ‘Darul Kaza’ or ‘Sharia Court’ is not recognized under Indian legislation and no command or decision given by them is not legally binding. A Bank of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah made this remark while filing a petition by a woman. In the case, a decision of the Allahabad High Court was disputed, in which the family court delivered the ruling on the basis of the agreement in the ‘Kazi Ki Adalat’. The Supreme Court, while blaming the decision of the family court, made it clear that the decision of such bodies is only valid for the aspects that voluntarily agree to implement it, but it cannot be legally implemented. The court also cited its historical decisions in 2014, the World Lochan Madan against the case of the Government of India, in which he declares that the Sharia courts and their fat was not recognized in Indian legislation. In this decision it was cleared that no non-governmental body could implement its decision on someone powerfully. It was reported that the woman was married on September 24, 2002, according to Islamic Customs. It was the second marriage of both. In 2005, a divorce case against the woman was filed in ‘Kazi’s Court’ Bhopal, which was later rejected on the basis of the agreement. In 2008, the man again filed a case for divorce in ‘Darul Kaja’ and a divorce was issued in 2009. In 2008, the woman filed a petition in the family court demanding maintenance, rejected by the family court. The Family Court argued that the woman himself left the house and that there was the second marriage of both, there was no possibility that the demand for dowry. The Supreme Court called this argument of the family court against the principles of law and only on estimates. The Supreme Court made the decision of the Family Court and ordered the man to pay Rs 4,000 a month from the date of filing a petition as a maintenance to the woman. The court also reiterated that the courts could not only conclude on the basis of any compromise. Please tell that this decision was expressed on February 4, which has now become public. -Ians DSC/CBT Share this story Tags