Is there a bribe behind the Migor case's judgment, what will you review?

Jakarta -The Attorney’s Office has unveiled the existence of a bribery scandal related to the verdict or a loose decision on the Crude Palm Oil (CPO) performance of Corruption (CPO) or raw material for cooking oil (fried). Four judges became suspects in the case. Supreme Court spokeswoman said Yanto that the decision of the Corruption Court in the Central Jakarta District Court was not yet inkrah. Because the prosecutor filed a remedy on March 27, 2025. “The decision of the Corruption Court at the Central Jakarta District Court was not yet permanent legal staff because the public prosecutor filed a legal effort on March 27, 2025,” Yanto said at a press conference at the Supreme Court, South Jakarta. Browse to continue the content, he said that his party is currently waiting for the completeness of the Corruption Court’s appeal file. Yanto ensured that the Supreme Court would later revise the case at the cache level. “After the cashier file is completed, the Central Jakarta District Court will immediately send an appeal file electronically to the Supreme Court,” Yanto said. “The public prosecutor has filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, and it will of course be tried at the cassational level by the cassational panel of judges later,” he added to ensure. On the other hand, the Supreme Court (MA) also temporarily rejected the judges and clerks involved in the bribery of the unstague judgment or freelance decisions on the corruption of the export of raw materials for cooking oil. The three were Judge Agam Syarif Baharudin, Judge Ali Muhtaro and Judge Djuyamto. “We are all obliged to respect the principle of suspicion of innocence during the legal process, judges and clerks nominated as suspects and detention will be temporarily rejected,” Yanto explained. “If there is a decision that has a permanent power, he will be rejected,” he added. Yanto said the Supreme Court respected the legal process conducted by the Attorney General’s office. He said the freelance decision was not yet a permanent legal force because the prosecutor filed an appeal on March 27. ” Decisions at the Central Jakarta District Court have not yet had a permanent legal power, because the public prosecutor presented a legal effort on March 27, 2025, the Central Jaka District Court Court immediately told the Supreme Court. ‘The Attorney General’s Office officially arrested the chairman of the South Jakarta District Court (PN), Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, in the alleged bribery of the unstague ruling or a loose decision on the rough palm oil (CPO) which also brought the raw material for Cooking Oil (roast). as well as the young clerk at the North Jakarta District Court and the lawyer who was also named a suspect in this case. Cases of bribery and satisfaction are related to the judgment of the unstague or loose decisions in the case of corruption in the export of raw materials for cooking oil. At the time, the panel of judges gave a loose decision to the corporate defendant. The three judges were Judge Agam Syarif Baharudin, Judge Ali Muhtaro and Judge Djuyamto. The three allegedly received a bribe worth RP 22.5 billion for the freelance sentence. The three judges, along with Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, compiled as chair of the South Jakarta District Court; Marcella Santoso and Ariyanto as advocates; As well as the young registrar at the North Jakarta District Court, Wahyu Gunawan. (Ond/Deck) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here