2 cadres sued another decision for the PDIP management extension to Ptun, that's the reason

Jakarta -Decision (SK) issued by the Ministry of Rights and Human Rights (Kemenkumham RI) related to the ratification of the management of the PDIP -PDIP 2019-2024 expanded to 2025 was again sued to Ptun Jakarta. The lawsuit was filed because it was allegedly not in accordance with the internal rules of PDIP. “So some of these cadres feel that the expansion of management is not true, so they will, the state administrative court to investigate, whether the procedure for issuing the decision of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights at that time was correct or not,” the lawyer of the plaintiff Anggiat BM Manalu said after the trial in the Jakarta Ptun, Cakung, East (6/25/2025). Anggiat said in the decision there was also a conflict of personal interests because the position of Kemenkumham was held by Yasonna Laoly. According to him, this management was expanded without a congress. Browse to continue the content “There is also a private interest because it happened that the Minister of Law at the time, Yasonna Laoly. While the association in the PDIP articles clearly said that Congress now ended on August 8, 2024, without a congress on the basis of the foundation.” Said Anggiat. “But we as the legal lawyer rather than the plaintiffs have investigated all the statutes, or the results of the determination at Congress V, but it did not explicitly give privilege rights. Although there are words that contain prerogative but do not expand management,” he added. Anggiat said his party would submit a witness who was a senior politician of the PDIP during the next trial. He said his client also accepted intimidation to recall this lawsuit. “Various types, ask to be recalled, there is also a little intimidation, there is also the attracting of different ways,” he said. For information, this lawsuit is registered by case number 113/g/2025/ptun.jkt registered on Thursday (27/3). The plaintiff in this case was two PDIP cadres, namely Johannes Anthonius Manoppo and Gogot Kusumo Wibowo. The defendant, namely the Indonesian Ministry of Rights, while the PDIP as the intervention recorded as the defendant. The first session of this case was held on Monday (5/6) at the Jakarta State Administrative Court (Ptun). Today’s trial is the 8th trial. The Pengant and the defendant submitted additional evidence. The judge subsequently examined the additional evidence presented by the parties. The plaintiff’s lawyer, Anggiat BM Manalu, said he would submit one witness and expert. The hearing will continue on Wednesday (2/7) with the agenda to submit additional evidence. Then continued with the examination of witnesses and experts of the plaintiff. The following is the content of the lawsuit of Anthonius and Gogot: 1 Given the lawsuit of the entire plaintiff 2. Explain zero or invalid decision of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia: M.Hh-05.11.02.tahun 2024 relating to ratification of structure, composition, and staff of PDIP Central Leaders 2024-2025. 3.. Require the Minister of Rights and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia to revoke the decision of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia: M.HH-05.Ah.11.02.Tahun 2024 regarding ratification of structure, composition and staff of the PDIP Central Council 2024-2025. 4. Punish the defendant to pay the case fee. (Mib/Eva) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here