The court can be heard today in the WAQF Supreme Court, the Court could give interim order on three issues - the Supreme Court to hear please. Challenge Waqf Amendment Act 2025

The Supreme Court will hear the petitions on Tuesday that disputes the constitutional validity of the WAQF Amendment Act 2025. The apex court may accept an interim order in this case. The requesters argue that only Muslims should operate it except ex -officio members. The Kerala government also opposed the Waqf Amendment Act 2025. Pti, New -Delhi. The Supreme Court will hear the petitions on Tuesday that disputes the constitutional validity of the WAQF Amendment Act 2025. The apex court may accept an interim order in this case. A Bank of Chief Justice Br Gavai and Justice Ag Christ postponed the hearing on May 15 to May 20, saying it would hear arguments to pass interim instructions on three issues. The first edition of this is related to the non-reflection of the WAQF declared properties by ‘WAQF by users’ or ‘WAQF by DID’. The second edition raised by the requesters is related to the structure of the state WAQF directions and the Central WAQF Council. Know what is the argument of the requesters, the requesters argue that only Muslims should operate it except ex -officio members. The third edition is related to the proceeds, according to which the collector will investigate whether the property is government land or not, WAQF property will not be regarded as WAQF. What is the meaning of waqf by the user? Waqf per user means a property that has long been used as WAQF property, even if there is no written WAQF action or document in its name, it will be considered as WAQF property. The bank asked senior lawyer Kapil Sibal and others and the Salisitor -General Tushar Mehta, who represents the validity of the law, to submit their written notes until Monday, May 19. However, the court made clear that the claim for interim ban on the original WAQF Act 1995 would not be considered. The advocates from both sides informed the back that the judges could take more time to study the arguments. In the last hearing, the center gave this confidence to the court, in the earlier hearing, the court was assured by the central government that the registered and notified of the WAQF, which included the WAQF BII user, would not be notified. In addition, it was also said that not -Muslim members will not be appointed to the central WAQF Parishad and WAQF directives. Earlier, a bank, led by former Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna, heard the case. Judge Khanna retired on May 13 and the cases were sent to a bank led by Justice Gawai. The Kerala government, which reached the Supreme Court in the WAQF case, took on the Apex Court to intervene in the petitions against the Constitutional validity of the WAQF amendment Act 2025. Waqf properties. The petition said that the state government believes that the anxiety of Muslim minorities in Kerala is reasonable that they are discriminated against in terms of the right to the management of religious matters, WAQF and WAQF properties. Many admissions of the Amendment Act are very unfair. On April 25, the Union Ministry of the Union filed an affidavit that defended the WAQF Amendment Act 2025 and opposed any complete residence on the Act adopted by Parliament. Also read: India has concluded 13 agreements with Maldive, Pakistan’s sleep; Know what this agreement is also read: ‘India is not a Dharamshala’, why did the Sri Lankan person tell the Sri Lankan person? The order to leave India has received every latest news and accurate information in the country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app