Supreme Court Judge Dipankar Datta warns against 'external powers' that impede judicial appointments | Today news

The Supreme Court Judge Justice Dipankar Datta on Saturday called on strict action against ‘external powers’ that impede judicial appointments, which challenges the widespread belief that judges decide only appointments under the Collegium system. The Apex Court judge addressed the ‘critics’ of the ‘Collegium System’. Misconceptions about judges who appoint judges who address critics of the Collegium system during a criminal ceremony for Chief Justice of India, Bhushan Gavai, organized by the Supreme Court Advocate Association in Nagpur, justice dipankar datta said: The Supreme Court judge highlighted delays in the implementation of Collegium recommendations, referring to his own experience as a member of the Calcutta High Court College in 2019. If judges were appointed, the judges would appoint, ‘he said. ” Why is this happening? No one questions it. ‘ Call for transparency and strict action Justice Datta has called on Chief Justice of India Bhushan Gavai to eliminate misconceptions and bring more transparency into the collegium system. “Sir, it is an appeal to you, it is high time that we have the misconited idea that judges appoint judges. Critics of the Collegium system are noisy, why should there be a college system? ‘ Livelaw quoted the Supreme Court judge. He further emphasized: “Therefore, the external powers that prevent the collegium recommendations should be handled strictly, and I feel that the pending proceedings must receive the highest priority to ensure that merit, earnings and merit are considered and not the strange considerations.” The reflection on the pre-collegium system, Justice Datta, is reminiscent of the 1980s pre-collegium era, pointing out how three chief judges of the Bombay High Court Mn Chandurkar, Chittadosh Moerterje and PD Desai-the chief were seen for the Supreme Court despite their merit. “Those who practice in front of these main judges and even others will know that they are no less than the judges who came to the Supreme Court in the 1980s,” he said. ‘Does anyone question the pre-collegium system? We only refer to the super session of these three judges by a judge in 1974 just before the Kesavananda Bharati ruling and then the SuperSess of Justice HR Khanna by the next Supreme Court Judge. But why doesn’t anyone question why CJ Chandurkar, CJ Moerterje or CJ Desai couldn’t make it to the Supreme Court? Justice Datta noted that the Collegium system was criticized for the opacity of the CJI Gavai’s leadership, and the progress to greater transparency acknowledged that the collegium system had been criticized for its opacity. “I would say from the opacity the system is now translucent, but Mr. among you expects that there must be a transparent process, and as you repeatedly said that there is no compromise on merit, there must be attached.” In response to these concerns, CJI Gavai quoted the recent appointment of Justice Atul Chandurkar, the senior master of the Bombay High Court, as “a living example of transparency in the college system.” He said: “We follow transparency, we work with the candidates and find that interactions work out. We have tried to maintain seniority and merit.” Maintaining judicial principles amid activism deals with justice DATTA has also addressed the developing role of judicial activism and warned against its extravagance. “Sometimes activism progresses to judicial adventurism and if it is further too much, critics say that it amounts to judicial terrorism,” Livelaw quoted that Justice Dipankar Datta.