Have unveiled 'one by' money to the trio of Judge Ronald Tannur

Jakarta -Surabaya District Court (PN) Judge, Mangapul, unveiled the ‘One Door’ agreement related to Gregory’s free verdict Ronald Tannur in the case of Dini Sera’s death. He claims that he understood the ‘one by’ agreement was a matter of money from the camp of Ronald Tannur. It was unveiled by Mangapul when he was a crown witness, the defendant who testified to another defendant. Mangapul testified to the Surabaya District Court Judge, Heru Hanindyo. The panel of judges who liberates Ronald Tannur consists of three people. They are actually Damanik as chairman and Mangapul and Heru Hanindyo as a member. The three were defendants in the alleged bribery case of Ronald’s free verdict. Browse to continue with the content “then in this witness statement in point 9 stating that after he said that the matter in the summit the case is free, the witness Erintuah said: ‘Okay, then one door’ is so right in this SKSI information point 9?” Ask the prosecutor Tuesday (8/4/2025) at Central Jakarta Corruption Court. “Yes,” replied Mangapul. He said there were two deliberations for the free ruling Ronald Tannur. The first summit was carried out after the defendant’s examination hearing, while the second summit was held after the hearing. “Then there was a few days later, I forgot, we were reminded that we were reminded again, that we gathered again in the room of suit Erin, and discussed that this case initially expressed his free opinion, but it was confirmed whether his opinion was free, finally we were the same as yesterday, it was just the words,” Mangapul said. Floating said the ‘one door’ was made by actuallyuah after the three agreed to free Ronald Tannur. He interprets the remarks of the One Door about giving a thanksgiving of Ronald’s lawyer, Lisa Rachmat. “These words must be clarified, one door in what sense is this witness?” Ask the prosecutor. “One door in the sense that Mr. Erin is, he, he didn’t say, but I understood all the intention to meet with Lisa to accept what it was, thank you, ‘replied Mangapul. “Money?” Ask the prosecutor. “Money,” replied Mangapul. The prosecutor then asked again about the summit until the one remarks came out. Mangapul said there were no objections or remarks from him or Heru when the one greeted the one door. “At the time, the answer agreed everything? One door? ‘ Ask the prosecutor. “Yes, we agreed in the sense that there was no comment, yes, that’s it,” replied Mangapul. “Defendant Heru?” Ask the prosecutor. “The same, there is no term, don’t, there is no, we,” we, “Mangapul said. “There’s no objection that means?” Ask the prosecutor. “Yes, that means you already know the same,” replied Mangapul. Mangapul claims goal -free pronunciation Ronald Tannur (Photo: Ari Saputra/Detikcom) In addition to the case of ‘One Door’ for money matters, Mangapul also gave an allegation that the consideration of Ronald Tannur’s free ruling was made objective. He claims to be surprised why the free decision was a problem. “Is Ronald Tannur innocent at the time? Or because there were Lisa promises, thanks or there was an invitation from Mr. Heru or Mr. Erin to, okay, everything was free because there was a promise? ‘ Ask Heru’s lawyer. “I personally come from the fact, he can indeed be free,” replied Mangapul. He was confused because a viral video related to early was conveyed. He claimed it was never shown during the hearing. “So that’s why I’m also a little confused, once we’re free, the next day there’s the news of this, what’s going on and so on, how is there no trials. So I was surprised why it became a problem with our verdict at the time,” Mangapul said. Mangapul claims that the panel of the judges agreed and agreed to free Ronald. He argued that the decision was made objectively. “There was an invitation from Mr. Re -launched deliberation to free? We leave it, sir, because there is an appointment? ” Ask Heru’s lawyer. “Nothing. So me, sorry, yes. Mr. Prosecutor, I said that at the time we focused the trial of the first trial to the end of the defendant’s exam, we ventured from the legal facts, the proof, which means we did not dare, which means we agreed. For information, Dini Sera died in October 2023 after he was suspected of being persecuted by Ronald Tannur in Lenmarc Mall, Surabaya. Ronald was nominated as a suspect until he was finally tried. In July 2024, the judging panel, which consists of ISUah, Mangapul and Heru, presented the free verdict against Ronald. The judge also considers the results of the post -mortem death of Dini’s body stating that there were injuries in different parts of the body, including multiple torn wounds in the liver due to blunt violence. The judge also said he saw CCTV footage and linked it to expert statements. The judge said he agreed with the statement of the expert who judged early on that he was outside the flow of the Ronald Tannur car. On this basis, the judge declared an accusation of the murder, the prosecution caused people to be killed, and negligence caused other people to die that prosecutors were not proven. The judge also released Ronald Tannur. The ruling of the judge caused a strong protest of the Dini Sera family. The prosecutor also filed appeal to the Supreme Court. Later, the three judges were arrested for allegedly receiving bribes to sentence Ronald Tannur. The three were charged with receiving a bribe of RP 1 billion and SGD 308 thousand, or equivalent to RP 3.6 billion related to Ronald Tannur’s free ruling. The bribe is said by Mrs. Ronald Tannur, Meirizka Widjaya, by her lawyer, Lisa Rachmat. The Supreme Court granted appeal of the prosecutor. Ronald Tannur was convicted of prosecution and sentenced to five years in prison. (HAF/HAF) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here