Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah dispute: Supreme Court has made HC's order; He said: 'Nothing in this' - Supreme Court maintains the Supreme Court order that allows amendment to Krishna Janmabhoomi Shahi Eidgah case

The Supreme Court justified the order of the Supreme Court in the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah case in which the Hindu side could change the basic case. The court said that the Supreme Court order seems correct at first glance. However, the appeal of the Masjid Committee is attached to the main issue and has been given time to submit written arguments. Jagran Bureau, New -Delhi. In the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah case, the Supreme Court said on Monday at the hearing on the Mask Committee’s appeal that the Supreme Court order allowing the Hindu side to amend the basic case is correct. Prima facie nothing looks wrong in it. However, the Apex Court has attached the appeal that disputed the Supreme Court order of the Masjid Committee to hear the main issue and postpone the hearing which gave time to submit written arguments. Allahabad HC gave permission to make ASI a party, the Allahabad High Court, in the March 5 command, amended the original case in which he claimed the royal Idgah of Lord Krishna Virajman and allowed the India Archaeological Survey (ASI) and the government of India to make the party. Sri Krishna Virajaman said in the application for the originality that the royal mosque Idgah Asi is protected monument, and that the place of worship will therefore not apply in this case. On this basis, the plea in the application was amended and permission was attempted to make ASI and the Government of India to the party, which was accepted by the Supreme Court. The Masjid Committee submitted in the petition. This amendment in the original case directly influences the objections raised on the basic case of the Masjid Committee, and its objections are emerged. Therefore, the Masjid Committee has dispute the order to amend the original Supreme Court case to allow the party to add the parties by submitting a petition in the Supreme Court. He says that the nature of the original case is changing by the command of the Supreme Court, so that the Supreme Court cannot allow the amendment in the middle. The petition of the Masjid Committee was before the Bank of Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna and Sanjay Kumar on Monday. Once the case came during trial. CJI questioned this question about the appeal of the Masjid Committee, Chief Justice Khanna, while questioning the appeal of the Masjid Committee, the lawyer told the lawyer that the Supreme Court’s order appeared to be correct at first glance. There is nothing wrong with it. The Apex Court, citing the CPC entertainment, said that order one, ordered six lines 17 would apply in the event of rules ten. The Pillow Court told the Masjid Committee that your argument is wrong in this regard. It is known that these provisions of CPC are related to amendment in a petition or basic. In the end, however, the court ordered that the Mosque Committee’s petition should be attached to the pending chief petition and gave it time to submit written arguments. Several petitions of the Mosque Committee are pending in the Supreme Court in which the main request has contested the Supreme Court order in which the Supreme Court rejected the petition that questioned the trial qualification of the Masjid Committee. The Masjid Committee opposed the trial of the basic cases of the Krishna Janmabhoomi case, making the place of worship the most important basis. After the amendment in that original case, the objections of the mosque side are impressed. Also read: ‘Why the government builds a 12 -foot -high wall near Somnath -Temple’, SC asked the government, the attorney -general gave this answer. SC has given two answers to every latest news and accurate information about the country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app