Karnataka: No relief for X about petition against the center, Karnataka High Court expressed the verdict - Karnataka HC refuses to relieve relief to X please against the center

The Karnataka High Court on Thursday refused to provide interim relief to the X (East Twitter) car in which he filed a petition against the compulsory requirement of the central government to join the collaboration portal and the court said the company currently does not have to be afraid of any resistance action. Karnataka High Court refuses to relieve X about the petition against the center (symbolic photo) Pti, Bengaluru. The Karnataka High Court on Thursday refused to give interim relief to the X (East Twitter) Carp in the event of filing a petition against the compulsory requirement of the central government to join the collaboration portal. The Karnataka High Court said about X, the court said the company is currently not afraid of any resistance. The court also said that X received freedom of protection when taken against any action. Judge M Nagprasanna heard an X’s petition against the government in which the company was instructed to join the collaboration portal. It is a platform that works to give instructions to social media and internet media lines to stop the content. Legal rescue is not the way to save X Corp. argued that this system does not have the way to give legal defense given under section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Instead, the government’s orders to stop the content is based on section 79 (3) (b) of the information technology, which limits the rescue of Internet intermediaries under the prescribed circumstances. On behalf of X, senior lawyer KG Raghavan argued that the Supreme Court maintained the validity of Article 69A in the Shreya Singhal case. He asked if the government could ignore these rescue measures through section 79 (3) (b). The X -Carp does not challenge Indian law. He prayed to the court to stop the government of any resistance action against the X Corp. as long as the company accepted the instructions to stop the content under section 69 (a). He emphasized that X Carp does not challenge Indian law, but that he asks questions about the way section 79 (3) (b) is used. All the mediators must obey Indian laws, while on behalf of the central government, the attorney -general Tushar Mehta and additional attorney -general Arind Kamath firmly states that all intermediaries must obey Indian laws and include content medium. Every latest news and accurate information from the country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app