Patna Metro: Supreme Court strictly to the appointment of consultant to Patna Metro Project, Reply of the Corporation - Supreme Court called the Corporation answer to the appointment of Patna Metro Project Consultant
The Patna High Court called Patna Metro Rail Corporation Limited to appoint a consultant in Patna Metro Rail Project. At the request of Dang Mizong Consultancy, the court instructed to submit a detailed answer by June 26. The requester allegedly lacked transparency in the tender process, which the court took note. Legal correspondent, Patna. The Patna High Court took a serious stance on the questions asked about the appointment of consultant (consultant) in Patna Metro Rail Project. While filing the written petition by the International Group Dang Mizong Consultancy, the Supreme Court Bank Patna Metro Rail Corporation ordered to submit a detailed answer by June 26. A Division Bank of Executive Chief Justice Ashutosh Kumar and Judge Para Sarathi issued this order just before the court’s summer holidays. What is the case, on behalf of the filor, the preference advocate Molly told the court that Patna Metro Rail Corporation sought interest from national and international businesses for the appointment of consultant. The requester followed all the procedures, but the technical tender was not opened. Meanwhile, the news published in the newspaper revealed that the corporation did not take transparency in the tender process to improperly prefer a Japanese company and added some conditions that were not determined in the tender document. The investigation conducted by the requester enterprise revealed that, with reference to confidentiality, the corporation added some qualifications that were not proper from a scientific and technical point of view. Attorney Molly told the court that if transparency will not be done in public interest -related projects such as Metro, the quality of the entire project will be under doubt. The court ordered the preferred lawyer Satyadarshi Sanjay, which appeared by the Metro Rail Corporation, to submit a legitimate and factual answer to the allegations made by the petition before June 26.