PARMY OLSON: The global technical holidays are a nightmare that should not be repeated

One of the most anxious things about the global disruption of IT systems last Friday is the extent to which such destructive events are repeated. In the past few years, similar crashes in companies such as “Amazon.com” have temporarily stopped the systems around the world, and this last problem comes as a result of updating failed software from the electronic security company “Crowdstrike Holdings”, which has caused the association of the giant client “Microsoft” with world problems, although chaos in air. It is now fixed. This time the amount of holidays was unprecedented. It would stimulate “Microsoft” and other IT businesses to do more than just temporary solutions. Policy models can also address excessive global accreditation in only three cloud services providers. Reality today states that one holiday can harm millions of people at the same time, and it should not be the prevailing situation. There is also a recommendation for you, dear reader: Do something good for your IT employees today. Bring them cakes, coffee or any stronger drink if they stay at work for a very late time because they will spend difficult times, as the solution to the closing problem is a slow and complicated process on Friday. Network technicians and engineers strive to correct the ‘Blue Death Screen’ that has appeared on Windows computers around the world, which actually makes it useless. The holidays forced the airlines to write their flight dates on white panels and issue handwritten paper tickets; Indeed, one of the TV news channels in Britain has stopped broadcasting. If protection is the source of danger! The cause of the defect is due to the update of the Falcon software used by the “Kraud Strike”, which aims to prevent the paradox from preventing damage caused by viruses and electronic threats, and is described as “a small lightweight sensor.” ‘Microsoft’ is an important customer, and most importantly, it has the privilege of accessing one of the most important centers of the Windows operating system, known as the ‘Nucleus’. This is a good idea in theory. If the “Craoud Strike” instrument does not have the ability to access, any malicious infiltration can access the operating system, the activation of the “CRUGS strike” virus simply cancel and disrupt everything. But it is now clear that there is a negative aspect to gain this kind of distinctive access if ‘Craoud Strike’ is wrong. For this reason, the blame should not fall on ‘Kraoud strike’ (the shares of which fell more than 20% early Friday morning), but also on ‘Microsoft’ because it did not design a more flexible operating system. Apple and Linux operating system was not affected at all throughout the holidays, according to the “Craoud Strike” blog Friday. None of them apparently give ‘Falcon’ such a distinctive access to its core, which apparently does not have wisdom. Microsoft did not respond to the comment. It is not an electronic attack that was not an electronic attack, but rather the result of the extreme complexity of cloud information technology operations such as previous interruptions. In the past decade, the electronic security industry has in itself excelled a protective stronghold of all kinds of frightening threats, but one of the negative aspects may be that businesses neglect the basic measures to maintain the safety, efficiency and security of information technology as this infrastructure has become more complicated. “Over the past few years, most of our clients have finally spent more on electronic security than their spending on information technology,” said Nixish Aroura, CEO of Palo Alto Networks, earlier this year. Of course, it is that one of the technical solutions returns to the old trick suggested by ‘stopping and managing the device’. Joao Alves, head of the engineering department on the “Adevinta” market, tweeted online, saying that the technology industry is likely to ask Cloud Services. The double operation of the operating system when the core units are updated. In a simple language, this means that the system is restarted when the software is updated. Microsoft does not have the questions at the time of writing the way you can do so. It did not have such activities, but it is only fragmented solutions. Do not lay eggs in one basket. European lawmakers are progressing to the farthest amid the suffocating grip on the market owned by those called ‘excellence’ by the new data law, which aims to lower the cost of switching between cloud service providers and improving the possibility of inter -employment. American lawmakers must also participate in the game. One of the ideas may be to force businesses in important sectors such as healthcare, financing, transport and energy to use more than one cloud supplier for their basic infrastructure, which tends to be the current situation. Instead, a new list can be forced by at least two independent service providers for their basic processes, or at least to ensure that there is no one who is more than about two -thirds of the biomedical infrastructure of his information technology. If one of the suppliers is broken, the other can keep things going. Although the service failure was painful on Friday, it would be a waste of time if we did not use it as an incentive to stop that quickly became a regular nightmare.