'No legal status of Sharia courts', the Supreme Court expressed the decision in favor of the woman in the divorce case -Sharia and Kazi -courts have no legal status

The Supreme Court has made it clear that the Sharia Court has no legal recognition of fatwa or decisions of institutions such as Qazi or Darul Kaza and is not binding. The remark was made during the hearing on the petition of a woman’s interview. The court ordered the woman to give a monthly allowance of £ 4000 and rejected the estimating -based comments of the family court. Jagran Bureau, New -Delhi. The Supreme Court said in one of the important decisions that there is no legal recognition of Kazi, Kaziyat or Sharia Court, and the fatwa or the order given by them is no binding and cannot be implemented. The court said in its latest order, in which he repeated the decision given in the world Lochan Madan case in 2014. A Bank of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah made this decision and accepted the maintenance of a woman. The court ordered the woman to pay a monthly maintenance of four thousand rupees. The clear attitude of the Supreme Court has repeated the Supreme Court in the decision of the world Lochan Madan, saying that there is no legal recognition of these courts called Kazi’s court, Darul Kaza or Kaziat Court of Sharia Court. The order given by them does not apply to the law and is not binding for the parties. The court said that their order could only be legally tested, while the parties involved accepted and implemented the decision and did not violate it. Even the decision will only be valid at the parties who accepted and implemented it, the decision will not be implemented on third party. The decision of the petitioner has disputed the decision of the High Court in Allahabad’s decision of the High Court in Allahabad in the case in which the Supreme Court confirmed the decision of the Family Court. According to the case, the requester woman married Islamic Customs on September 24, 2002. It was the second marriage of husband and wife. In 2005, the man filed a divorce case with the woman in Qazi’s court, which was rejected on the basis of the agreement between the two. The man’s second attempt and the woman’s petition, hereafter, in 2008, the man again filed a divorce case in Darul Kaja, that is, Kaziyat’s court. In the same year, the woman filed a petition with the family court in terms of section 125 of the CRPC demanding a living allowance from the man, but the family court refused and said it was the second marriage of both and that the woman was responsible to separate. This order of the family court was disputed by the woman in the Allahabad High Court, but the Supreme Court also rejected the petition. After this, the woman turned to the Supreme Court. The remark of the Supreme Court and the ruling, the woman, in the petition demanding the maintenance of maintenance, claims that the man cruel her cruelty because he did not fulfill the motorcycle and the claim of Rs 50,000. In this case, the family court said that the man, as it was the second marriage, probably would not ask for dowry, he was trying to settle his home again. The Supreme Court is questioning the decision of the Family Court and said that the comments it made is not known in law, they are based on estimates. The Supreme Court said the family court could not conclude that both had a second marriage, and there would be no demand for dowry. It would not be a dowry question. Download now- Jagran app