Debates completed in the Supreme Court about declaring Mathura's Royal Idgah Mosque as a disputed structure, ensured the decision

The Allahabad High Court rejected the petition to make Radharani a party in the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute case. After this, a new application was filed in court to make Rukmini a party. While hearing the case on Friday, the Supreme Court rejected the application to make Radha Rani a party after hearing the arguments of both parties. A petition was filed as a court friend in the Allahabad High Court to make Radha-Rani a party. It has been argued that Shyam is incomplete without Radha-Rani. Lord Krishna is the most important plaintiff in this matter. The property is his. Lord Krishna is considered incomplete without Radha Rani throughout the Braj Mandal and the whole world, so Radha Rani will be considered inherent in all Lord Krishna property. In such a situation, it is also necessary to involve Radha-Rani in the dispute. It is known that in the shooting number seven an application was made in December 2023 to make Radha-Rani a party. At the same time, Hareram Tripathi, a lawyer for Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust, opposed the making of Radha-Rani a party. It has been argued that Lord Shri Krishna Lala is minor. Small idols are in the form of idols. All the property is his. It is registered by the trust in his name. Since God is a minor, no one as the wife of Lord Krishna can be proposed. This case is in court, so no one should make a side in it without any interested party. The Muslim side said he had no objection to Radha-Rani to form a party. It has yet to be seen whether the application is acceptable by legal provisions. Share this story -tags