Musk's interest in artificial intelligence must remain far from "Tesla"

One of the analysts who followed “Tesla” and cared for all the details and the most accurate of its extensive detailed view of the business in one line: “The car represents for (Tesla) for which the video game represent (invitation) and the sale of books for (Amazon).” Adam Jonas of Morgan Stanley has been shown to turn “Tesla” from an electric car manufacturer to one of the most active artificial intelligence businesses and robots. Based on this view, the Tesla car is no longer just a box that moves over wheels and has a battery, but rather a car with the benefits of artificial intelligence. Tesla, CEO, Elon Musk, promotes this idea with his ordinary display style and says once: “If anyone does not believe that (Tesla) will solve the problem of self -leadership, I think he should not invest his money in the business.” It may be appropriate to place a star mark on the statement. Over the weekend, the Wall Street Journal published a report stating that Xai, who specializes in artificial intelligence, founded by Elon Musk, together with the company “X”, which is specialized in social media, offered the license of its artificial intelligence models to support Tesla’s pursuit in the field of self -management. Musk denied this report through a series of tweets and described it as ’empty linguist’. In another context, just five months earlier, the Reuters mask accused the lie after publishing a report stating that “Tesla” abandoned its plans to manufacture an electric car at less than $ 30 thousand dollars. After a short period, the company announced its transformation of plans to produce a low -cost -electric car to the development of the “robotics” self -taxi. In addition, Musk has already been the opinions of his loyal followers, who make up a kind of -official ‘governments’, sought or invested in ‘Xai’. The majority reaction came in the affirmative. Mask has always been used to dealing with its various businesses as if it were parts of one integrated entity. One of the most important examples of this was the acquisition of “Tesla” on the company “Solar City” in 2016, where the Electric Cars Company bought the solar panel installation business after which the mask was on the way, and it was a city for him and the Speus X Company, which was run by his cousin. Thereafter, Jonas described the agreement as an “intentional and directed bombing.” When Musk used the ‘Twitter’ platform, which later turned into ‘X’, he used an “Tesla” engineer to review her codes. A few months ago, Musk redirected the thousands of chips that Tesla bought from Invidia to his company “Xai”, and it justifies that it is just a simple logistical problem. If “Tesla” already decides to invest billions of dollars in “Xai”, whether the income is shared or not, it will be the clearest example of the conflict of potential interests. Since the assessment of a mask on “X”, the company has experienced great pressure on advertising revenue, and Videliti, which is his investor, has significantly reduced the value of his share. Musk pointed out that the shareholders would own “X” 25% of “Xai”, but he did not explain whether this session would be granted individually to each shareholder or jointly via “X”. In both cases, any cash or possible income from “Tesla” will be in the interests of “Xai” and also in the interests of the “X” project in general. In addition, this agreement will make the justifications for “Tesla” to give a large option package mask, and then press to return it after a Dilayer court canceled it, the subject of mockery. Robin Dunholm, chairman of the board of directors of “Tesla”, invited the shareholders to vote yes about the package, pointing out that it will ensure the focus of mask on “Tesla”. And she wrote in her message: “We want these ideas to go, and that energy, and the time to (Tesla), for you, you, the stock of shares.” This comes after the threat of Al -Dahni Musk to transfer his vision of artificial intelligence to another place if he does not get a larger share in “Tesla” after selling a large part of it to finance the acquisition of “Twitter”. The problem of self -leadership, as the matter with ‘Tesla’ ends to invest in another project controlled by mask, or contract it, and in his name carries the term artificial intelligence, indicates that some of the ideas of mask in this field have changed to another place, whether or not he has acquired a package of options. Away from the conflict of interest and manipulation of management, there is a more fundamental matter. Jonas, like other optimistic analysts, writes only a small part of his “Tesla” assessment to the manufacture and selling of electric cars, although these activities constitute the vast majority of the company’s revenue and profits. The only way to justify the market value of the business of approximately $ 700 billion is the belief that “Tesla” is not just a car manufacturer, but rather a leading company in the field of artificial intelligence. But if this is the case, and if “Tesla” already wants to “solve the problem of self -management”, why do you then think of using an external business to adopt the basic functions of artificial intelligence? And why do you feel the need to invest billions of dollars in a start that was only founded last year? Motor industry companies usually have partnerships for advanced technologies. But for years, Musk has insisted that “Tesla” is about to solve the entire self -management problem, depending on his own abilities. If “Tesla” begins to pump money or transfer revenue into “Xai”, it undermines the novel that has been promoted for a long time, and threatens to deprive the “Tesla” shareholders of some promised returns, which could lead to the directing of these returns to the private mask projects. It can only be suggestions or polls, and it does not exceed its limits. However, there is a remarkable line in the Jonas report that is still stuck in the mind, which indicates that investors should prepare for a new strategy for the company “Link (Tesla) more clearly with other Illon -controlled companies, such as (Starlink), (SpaceX), (X) and (XAI).” Ultimately, independence means what it deems appropriate. In short, “Tesla” is changed from just an electric car manufacturer to a leading business in the fields of artificial intelligence and robots, which means that the car for Tesla is just a gateway to larger technology, just like the electronic games of “invitations” or E -books of Amazon.