He invalidated the gift of a home from Bahraini to his spouse ahead of his loss of life because he did now not plod away him

The Sharia Supreme Courtroom of Allure invalidated a present, which is a home in Arad Wahba, Bahraini ahead of his loss of life, with out his eight youngsters from a old spouse, and the court acknowledged that the donor remained pronounce and inhabited within the property, the subject of the pursuit until his loss of life, and the possession in which the king moved was no longer done by the exit of the donor from the home ahead of his loss of life no subject his possession of several other homes. The lawsuit takes its details, basically based on what the attorney Muhammad al -Sharabi acknowledged, that the eight youngsters of Bahraini were vastly an extraordinarily good deal surprised that their father’s spouse transferred the possession of the home that he was in Arad to possession on the pretext that their father had gave him for the period of his lifestyles, so that they filed a lawsuit ahead of the Sharia court, tense the annulment of the gift, stressing that it had happened for the period of the period of loss of life and was then an absence of files. The fundamental level issued its ruling to reject the lawsuit, and obligated the prosecutors expenses and in alternate for the expenses of law, but this ruling was no longer licensed by the appellants, they assuredly challenged it, they assuredly requested the abolition of the ruling and the judiciary again to nullify the top possible gift and possess in mind it as if it was no longer and re -registration of the property within the name of the donor inherited the appellant The exact property file for the exact property is the subject of the gift contract. The attorney pushed the law wrongly within the applying of the law and the provisions of the fair Sharia when he spent the court ruling of the key level to reject the case, basically based on the bonds that collide with the texts of the law and the actuality of the lawsuit, and the violation of the constant within the papers from the scientific reports of the divulge of the donor. And for him, that the talented within the gift behaves the angel within the lifestyles of the donor; In drawl for the top possible possession to which the king strikes, and what Ibn Abi Zaid al -Qayrawani mentioned in his message: “There might be now not this form of thing as a present, charity, or imprisonment, except with possession, if he dies ahead of he’s field to it, it is an inheritance.” The commandment, except there might be evidence that contradicts that. ” He remained pronounce and inhabited within the exact property the subject of the plan until his loss of life, and then the situation of the evacuation was no longer done, and that the appellant in opposition to it did now not bear it proper possession, or receives it or possesses proper possession, or puts its hand on it, and then the appellant in opposition to it did now not simplify its cloth non-public a watch on over the property, or appear in it as the proprietor of the proprietor, and did now not possess the benefit of it or the arrest and evacuation of the lifestyles The commandment, correct as the choice is a jurisprudence that there might be now not this form of thing as a will for an inheritance. By canceling the appealed judgment, and the judiciary again to nullify the Sharia gift and possess in mind it as if it weren’t.