The thing that Judge Heru made was the most serious in the Ronald Tannur case

Jakarta – Surabaya District Court (PN) Judge Heru Hanindyo, has been charged with 12 years imprisonment in the bribery case of Gregory Ronald Tannur. This question is the highest compared to the other two judges. It is known, the panel of judges who freed Ronald Tannur is chaired by Heru Hanindyo and Mangapul. The third claim hearing was held at Central Jakarta Corruption Court on Tuesday (4/22/2025). Erintuah and Mangapul are demanded to be 9 years imprisonment and a fine of RP 750 million in 6 months incarceration. Heru was claimed higher, which was 12 years in prison and a fine of RP 750 million in 6 months incarceration. Browse to continue with the content “the defendant Heru Hanindyo, with a imprisonment for 12 years, is fully reduced by the length of the defendant to be detained with an order, so that the defendant will be detained in the State Understanding Center,” the prosecutor said while reading a letter of claim. The prosecutor said the relief of Heru’s claims was never convicted. Meanwhile, the burden of Heru’s demands is not to support government programs in the framework of state administration that is clean and free of corruption, collusion and nepotism. Heru was also considered to cause public confidence in the Judicial Institution, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The prosecutor also believed that Heru was not cooperative and did not acknowledge his actions. “The defendant was not cooperative and did not acknowledge his actions,” the prosecutor said. Meanwhile, things alleviate the demands of ENUah and Mangapul, namely the responsibility as the head of the family. Both are also called prosecutors to be collaborative by recognizing their actions and providing information that can prove in other matters on behalf of Heru Hanindyo, Mangapul, Lisa Rachmat, Zarof Ricar and Meirizka Widjaja. Erintuah and Development have never been punished and a good faith has received the money from Ronald’s lawyer, Lisa Rachmat. Erintuah returned the money worth SGD 115 thousand, while Mangapul returned the money worth SGD 36 thousand. The prosecutor believes that Erintuah, Heru and Mangapul Article 6 paragraph 2 and section 12B Juncto article 18 of the Corruption Act Juncto conflicted. Article 55 paragraph 1 of the 1st of the penal code. (Mib/haf) high awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here