'Former Supreme Court judges receive equal pension', gave the Supreme Court special order on one rank - one pension - Supreme Court ordered equal pension for all retired Supreme Court judges

The Supreme Court has directed equal pension benefits for retired judges of the Supreme Court, whether the method or term of appointment is something. The court said that there should be the principle of one rank one pension in connection with the constitutional position and that there should be no discrimination in the payment of pension. The court also said that additional judges will also receive the same pension as permanent judges. Pti, New -Delhi. The Supreme Court has directed equal pension benefits for all retired judges from all the Supreme Court in the country, regardless of their appointment method or tenure. The court said that there must be the principle of “one rank, one pension” in connection with the constitutional post. The decision said that in all cases there should be no discrimination in the payment of pension. The Supreme Court also said that retired judges of the Supreme Court should be given equal pension. Additional judges will also receive the same pension as permanent Supreme Court judges. A Bank of Chief Justice Br Gawai and Justice Agustin George Christ and K Vinod Chandran decided that any kind of classification in pension benefits, or the judges from the bar or district judges, or being permanent or additional judges, was discriminated with and conflicted with Article 14 of the Constitution. The need to give equal pension to all retired judges has also made the bank clear whether a judge of the Supreme Court full of pension can be denied, whether there is a difference in their service. The Chief Justice said in a decision of 63 page that a rank, a pension principle, should receive equal pension to all retired judges of the Supreme Court. The bank said we found that when a judge accepted the charge of the Supreme Court judge and entered the constitutional category, no variation would be acceptable on the basis of appointment. If a judge of the Supreme Court is employed, regardless of the source of their entry, they receive equal payment and grants. The bank said that when all the Supreme Court judges are employed, entitled to equal payment, grants and benefits, then any form of discrimination between them would be clearly discriminatory and a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. What did the court still say in the case? The court also said that a judicial officer who became a judge of the Supreme Court of judicial services and a judge of the Supreme Court was taken by the experience of a second partner, should also be kept in mind. Difference in the service between the date he retires as a district judge and the date on which the Supreme Court judge is charged cannot form the basis for paying pension. The pension of such judges must be on the basis of salary received as judges from the Supreme Court. A person who retires as the judge of the Supreme Court, even if he has been appointed to the state justice after the new Pension Fund Fund (NPS) has been implemented, he will receive the benefit of the General Provide Fund (CPF) under the salary and terms of service of the salary and services of the Supreme Court judges. The pet will gain the benefit of the permanent judge and the additional judge said that the artificial discussion will be union. Therefore, we make it clear that retired additional Supreme Court judges will also receive the same original pension, that is, Rs 13.50 Lakh per year. The bank clearly calls it arbitrary about the issue of family pension and gratuity. Also read: ‘India is not a Dharamshala’, why did the Sri Lankan person say the Supreme Court? Also received the order to leave inda. Also read: Professor Khan arrest case: ‘Meal today or tomorrow himself …’, what did the Supreme Court say about Sibal’s argument? Every latest news and accurate information from the country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app