Bribes bribes in the Migor of Migor of the Mafia of Zarof Ricar

Jakarta -Once again, the attorney -general’s office (ago) decorated the judge as a bribery suspect. Investigation a calibaration It appears that there is another common thread between the current case and bribery cases that were also investigated by the ago about three months ago. This latest case is related to the dismissal or corporate decision in the case of alleged corruption in the supply of rough palm oil (CPO) or cooking oil raw materials. Behind the verdict, the prosecutor’s office suspected that there was an eye play between the judges and the defendant’s lawyers. As a result, a number of suspects were snapped. Berikut Daftarnya: Browse to continue with content 1.⁠ ⁠muhammad Arif Nuryanto (man) Selaku Ketua Pengadilan Negro Jakarta Selatan (Pn Jakel) 2.⁠ ⁠djuyamto (DJU) Selaku Ketua Majelis Hakim3.⁠ Selaku3.⁠ ⁠agam Majelis Hakim4.⁠ ⁠ali Muhtarom (Am) Selaku Anggota Majelis Hakim5.⁠ ⁠Wahyu Gunawan (WG) as a clerk 6.⁠ ⁠ Marcella Santoso (MS) as an advocate7.⁠iyanto Bakri (AR) as a lawyer. namely PT Wilmar Group, PT Permata Hijau Group, and PT mas mas Group in the alleged corruption for corruption of cooking oil or corruption corruption. The three gave the power to Marcella and Ariyanto. Surprisingly, the panel of judges consisting of Djuyamto, Agam and Ali dropped the discharge or a loose decision, which meant that the actions committed by the 3 corporations were not criminal offenses. From the investigation of the prosecutor’s office, information on the alleged bribery found behind the decision. The chairman of the South Jakarta District Court, Muhammad Arif Nuryanto, was known that he had previously served as deputy chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court (Waka Pn Jakpus) who had the authority to appoint a judge who heard the case. In short, there was a collusion between Marcella-Si-Siyanto and Muhammad Arif Nuryanto. Bribery applies RP 60 billion flows to Arif Nuryanto and some of them are channeled to the 3 panel of judges. While Wahyu Gunawan became a bribe as a clerk. The question is where is the source of prosecutors’ information? In the form of this case, there is another connection with other cases that were also previously investigated by the prosecutor, namely the bribery case related to the free ruling against Gregory Ronald Tannur at the Surabaya District Court (PN). The case that was taken apart earlier this year involved a number of suspects, namely: 1. ⁠rudi Suparmono as the former chairman of the Surabaya District Court2. Tannur7.⁠ ⁠ Zarof Ricar as a former Supreme Court official (mother) of the bribery bribery is more or less the same, namely from the mother of Ronald Tannur, with Lisa Rahmat who gave bribes to the judges, so that Ronald Tannur was sentenced to be related to the early Death Sera Afrianti. What, then, is the role of Zarof Ricar? In this case, Zarof Ricar is suspected as a case broker connecting bribery to the judge. In the development of the case, the prosecutor’s office found a lot of evidence of alleged satisfaction. It turned out that the prosecutor’s office also found information about Marcella Santoso’s bribery to judges who heard the alleged case of corruption. “So this is the case. The investigator after the ruling of the dismissal, of course, suspected that there were indications that were not good. There was an unlucky of the discharge, but when dealing with the case in Surabaya (bribery related to the free judgment of Ronald Tannur), there was also information on the name of the MS (Marcella) law (Marcella),” (Marcella) said. cases of cases revealed from Zarof Ricar.