3 judges become a suspect of bribery, member of the commission III of the house

Jakarta – Member of the House of Representatives Commission III of the Democratic Party faction, Hinca Pandjaitan, highlighted relating to oversight in the judicial environment in the aftermath of the 3 judges became a suspect in the release of the corruption of the raw materials for oil. He criticized the actions of the Judicial Commission (KY). “I say I say that supervision in a great zero judicial environment. It’s time we evaluate the institutional of the judicial commission, or the bitterness we only distribute. If the judicial commission cannot monitor the judge, why is it held? Browse the content “We need to strengthen the supervisory mechanism, or if KY is not able, we know at least what institutions should be hopeful, and what time is the time to close the story,” he said. of bribery still find the way. We can contribute the air -height revenue rate, but if the opportunity to “pass the” more tempting penalty, the black transaction eventually becomes a rational choice, “he said. He said that with the case of this bribery -suspect, it is unmistakable that public confidence in the judicial institution is at the point of Nadir. This condition, he said, was not only born that way, but the accumulation of a series of disappointing scandals. “In short, I want to hope that the decision at the cache level will restore the public’s trust, not to strengthen bad assumptions,” he said. Furthermore, Hinca referred to the House of Representatives Commission III whether it was necessary to add the matter of supervision on advocates in the Advocate Bill. Because, he said, the supervision has so far been in the supervisory board of every advocate organization. “In fact, I also have an advocate background before I sat on Commission III. I understand that I understand very well how the ‘autonomy’ of the world of advocates is often interpreted as unlimited freedom,” Hinca said. “The question is: Is supervision sufficient if it is submitted to the supervisory advice of every advocate organization? In my opinion, it is the same as asking foxes to protect the chicken coop. Of course, there are many honest advocates, but not a few that gown as a protective robe of dark lobby practices,” he continued. He said that if the DPR is serious, it should be considered an independent supervisory model that can really bite. Hinca was of the opinion that it was not necessary to be dependent on internal signs that were clearly prone to compromise, because so far, many advocate organizations could not violate members who violated the code of ethics. “For me, it is not a matter of” rape “of autonomy, but to ensure the integrity of the profession that has an important role in law enforcement,” he said. Hinca referred to the discourse that held out to the public that the Supreme Court would oversee lawyers. But, he said, the current condition was sad because Mom has also had a full title of scandal lately. “How does the story ask the institution shaken by bribery and collusion to bring order to advocates?” He added. Previously, the chairman of the South Jakarta District Court, Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, was named a suspect related to the bribery case of dealing with cases in the Central Jakarta District Court. In addition, there were also 3 judges, as well as the young clerk at the North Jakarta District Court and the lawyer who was also nominated as a suspect in this case. Cases of bribery and satisfaction are related to the judgment of the unstague or loose decisions in the case of corruption in the export of raw materials for cooking oil. At the time, the panel of judges gave a loose decision to the corporate defendant. The three judges were Judge Agam Syarif Baharudin, Judge Ali Muhtaro and Judge Djuyamto. The three allegedly received a bribe worth RP 22.5 billion for the freelance sentence. The three judges, along with Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, compiled as chair of the South Jakarta District Court; Marcella Santoso and Ariyanto as advocates; As well as the young registrar at the North Jakarta District Court, Wahyu Gunawan. (FAS/IDN) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here