Critics of artificial intelligence in alphabet ask the wrong questions

A few Alphabet shareholders recently formed an unexpected alliance when they demanded the company to pay more attention to the risks associated with artificial intelligence. The National Center for Legal Policy (NLPC) expressed concern about the impact of artificial intelligence on privacy rights, while ‘Inviration Investing’ – a shareholder -supported investment responsible for conservative Christian religious principles and sometimes opposed to what is known as the policy that supports social vitality – Censorship on the discourse of religious and political. The same that is characterized by these efforts by the political appearance is the recent criticism of artificial intelligence on the same approach. By evaluating his own performance. This is not limited to the loss of jobs. This is the most important risk of artificial intelligence. More details here are the National Center for Legal Policies to compile a report that explains whether it was used by individuals’ data to train its systems based on artificial intelligence. The effect of advertising techniques based on artificial intelligence in human rights, according to the company’s statement in the report of the shareholders for the year 2025. Alphabet confirmed that there is no need as it is already doing sufficient research to assess the risks. Advanced artificial. ‘In addition to other suggestions, it is certainly a positive matter to emphasize whether Google is the abuse of personal data, but all these claims do not have the core because it calls the company itself to prepare these reports, not independent organizational parties or external researchers. This makes these proposals more like a display activity than their efforts to cause real change, especially as some groups such as the National Center for Legal Policy Advantage were in different technological enterprises. Technological enterprises. Algorithms, and now artificial intelligence models designed, in the circle of ambiguity, and indicate their detailed reports when they face pressure from the legislators or civil organizations. by independent experts to perform models in different indicators. “Training, which is the element that kept” oben ai “. If alphabet contributors wanted to continue the path of real change, they must claim an external supervision: an independent technical review – before one of the four main accounting enterprises, for example, or of academic institutions – to evaluate the company’s systems before using a part of the transpiration.