China's silence on the ban on "Tek Tok" in America has great indications

Beijing keeps a remarkable silence while struggling with the “Tech Talk” application to stay in the United States, especially as it is the first successful global application that comes from the Chinese technological sector. The controversy remained on whether Washington ‘Tok Tok’ would be prohibited due to safety issues related to the mother business, ‘Byte Dance’, based in Beijing. In the past, Chinese officials did not hesitate to express their opposition loudly, but as the likelihood of a ban is closer, they are now choosing the commitment to calm and hold a conservative position. A quiet strategy in the months that followed the submission of legislation in Congress that enforced “Tik Talk” by “byte” until they had recently arrived at the US courts, the Chinese spokeswoman for the Ministry of Foreign Avoid to comment and chose to refer to previous statements. (The most prominent of these was a statement in March in which trade officials confirmed that China would defend its ‘legal rights and interests’). However, the interpretation of this silence as a sign of the surrender of China to the ban will be premature. US businesses that depend on the second largest economy in the world, such as “Apple” and “Tesla”, must prepare to receive mutual strikes as the crisis escalates. It would not be wise for US policymakers to reduce the possibility of a strong response from Beijing, especially as she had previously described this kind of American measure as ‘Fly’. The US Tek Tok court and US risks were not the last trial held last week in the Washington Circle Court in the interests of “Tok Tok” as the chances of stopping the ban from 70%to 30%, according to the Bloomberg Intelligence “analysts. Government officials expressed self -control, the Chinese media returned by the state gave a look at the official position. Western exploitation of China, dating back to the period in which the British arms forced the Chinese to buy opium. She warned that attempts to impose coercion and humiliation would fail. Similarly, other editors in various media have accused the United States of trying to “booty” byte -dance. China’s priorities extend beyond the returns of investors, even US -Chinese committee policy makers, it seems that they realize that Beijing and “Byte Dance” will never allow the sale of the precious algorithm to talk to a ‘tik’ with a foreign buyer. China has amended its export laws in 2020 to protect ‘safety and national interests’, which are widely considered in response to initial discussions related to the ban on application. The ‘Tap Talk’ recommendation Engine, which attracts users through individual content and retains and continues their interaction, is the most important secret that distinguishes the application of its competitors. Some commentators argue that China’s response by setting up additional sanctions or sending political signals, foreign investment, which already drops to historical levels, will not be logical, especially in the midst of the current economic decline. They say that the prevention of selling will harm the global investors of “bait dance”. However, this recognition ignores the fact that Beijing has limited its technological sector in favor of greater political goals, through a strict suppression campaign that was recently the seriousness. And if there has been something to light on the priorities of the government over the past few years, it is that the returns of investors and the rapid growth in the technological sector are no longer among the priorities of the Chinese government, the slogan of President Xi Jinping ‘general wealth’ and innovation of the country has become the country’s technological independence. The US market is a danger that the United States realizes that the game it plays with “Tik Talk” is uneven because of its advanced position in the pyramid of world technology, but it can also be a two -sword. While China risks the loss of foreign investment if it prevents the sale of the application, this step can be considered a victory, as Beijing can send a message to the world that any project that strives to succeed in the profitable US market will not be safe from challenges. Beijing can also study the options available while waiting for the results of the US presidential election. Although Donald Trump was the one who started this email when he was president, he later indicated as a candidate for the presidency that he would oppose the comprehensive prohibition of “Tok Tok” because he could improve the position of his most important competitor, “Mita platforms”, the “Facebook” parental business. American lawmakers filled the void left by Beijing’s silence, and they strongly defended the constitutional right to freedom of expression, while at the same time trying to prohibit a platform used by more than 170 million Americans to express their opinions. Despite the filming of ‘Tech Talk’ as a threat to national security, the case was not limited to President Joe Biden’s team that joined this debate, but the application also became an important tool in the election campaigns for both presidential candidates. For example, Memat spread around coconut trees and the atmosphere of the ‘riotous girl’ on ‘Tap Talk’, which contributed to raising the popularity of Kamala Harris in the polls raised by the application. The paradoxes of the ban are the paradoxes that the United States use a non -democratic process to prohibit application under the pretext of protecting its democracy. Nearly half of Americans use ‘Tok Tok’, and less than a third support the ban, and seven million US businesses have accounts on the application. The evidence that ‘Tech Talk’ is a real threat that is still secret, and not just to the American public, but even for the attorneys of ‘Tek Tok’, hidden. The ban on the ban was accelerated via the congress and linked to a foreign aid package aimed at supporting Israel and Ukraine. Lawmakers who are concerned about social media risks must pass comprehensive laws to protect the data of the Americans and to ensure the safety of users from threats on all platforms. Under these circumstances, the ban on “Tech Talk” will only lead to an extra ammunition for the Chinese propaganda machine. Beijing can now be a wise decision. The actions of the United States speak for itself. In short, the article deals with the remarkable silence of Beijing about the controversy about the possibility of prohibiting the “Tok Tok” application in the United States, although it is one of the most prominent global applications arising from China. The article highlights the concerns of US national security linked to the Chinese “Bait Dance” business, and assesses legislative and judicial developments that can lead to the ban on application or separation from the parent company. It also discusses the role of China in defending its interests, with an indication of the possibility of revenge measures against US businesses. The article indicates that the United States undermines the freedom of expression as opposed to the allegations of democracy.