Can the Supreme Court decide the deadline of the bill? President Murmu asked the court these 14 questions - can deadlines for President Governors agree to Bills President Droupadi Murmu asked SC 14 questions
The time limit was set to make decisions on the bill that the legislative meeting adopted to the governors and the president. President Draupadi Murmu objected to this High Court decision. He said that if the Constitution gives the right to make a decision on a bill, the Supreme Court (SC) falls in the middle of this case. Ians, New -Delhi. President Draupadi Murmu objected to the April 8 ruling on April 8. In this, the time limit was set to make decisions on the bill adopted by the governors and the president. According to the IANS report, the round of this decision of the Supreme Court continued for a long time. Draupadi Murmu asked about 14 questions from the Supreme Court in this case. In fact, on April 8, the Supreme Court ruled that the governor would have to make a decision on a bill within three months. If the meeting again passes the bill, the governor will have to approve it within a month. What was the decision of the Supreme Court? According to Ians, if a bill is sent to the president, the president will have to make decisions within three months. President Murmu objected to this High Court decision. President Murmu’s question to SC When a bill of the Constitution of India is submitted to the Governor in terms of Article 200 of the Constitution, what are the constitutional options before him? If the Constitution gives the full right to make a decision on a bill, why does the Supreme Court (SC) interfere in this case? The president said that articles 200 and 201, which apply to the governors and the president, determine no time or procedure adopted by them while considering the bill passed by the Legislative Assembly. Is the governor bound by the assistance and advice given by the Council of Ministers while using all the options with him when a bill is submitted in terms of Article 200 of the Constitution of India? Is the use of constitutional discretion justified by the Governor in terms of Article 200 of the Constitution of India? Does Article 361 of the Constitution of India plan a complete ban on judicial review regarding the functions of the governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? In the absence of constitutionally fixed timeframe and method to use the powers by the governor, the governor deadlines can be imposed in the imprisonment by judicial orders for the use of all powers under Article 200 of the Constitution of India and the method of experimentation? Should the president ask the Supreme Court’s opinion to consult the Supreme Court through reference under section 143 of the Constitution of India and to secure the Governor’s permission bill? Is Article 200 of the Constitution of India correct in the phase before the implementation of the governor and the president in terms of Article 200 and Article 201? Is it acceptable for courts to make judicial decision on the subject before a law is made? Can the use of constitutional powers and the orders of the President/Governor be replaced in any way in terms of section 142 of the Constitution of India? , Is the law passed by the state law, without the permission of the Governor in terms of Article 200 of the Constitution of India? Does the Constitution stop any other jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to resolve the disputes between the central government and the state governments, except for a hearing under section 131 of the Constitution of India? In light of determining section 145 (3) of the Constitution of India, it is not necessary that any bank of this Hon’ble Court decides that the question involved in the proceedings is of nature that includes important questions about the law as an interpretation of the Constitution and refers to a bank of at least five judges? Are the powers of the Supreme Court been limited to matters of the procedural law in terms of section 142 of the Constitution of India, or has Article 142 of the Constitution of India expanded until it is corrected/orders that contradict the existing original or procedural provisions of the Constitution or Applied Act? Every latest news and accurate information from the country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app