Bribery rp. 60 billion chairman of the South Jakarta District Court Telendus from the testimony of the Ronald Tannur ruling

Jakarta -The Attorney’s Office (ago) office has appointed the chairman of the South Jakarta District Court, Muhammad Arif Nuryanta (man), related to the allegations of receiving bribery and the regulation of the onslaught or three corporate defendants in the crude palm oil (CPO). Apparently, this case was unveiled from the evidence found in the bribery case of the Grogius -free Hamed Judge Ronald Tannur at the Surabaya District Court. “This is the case, the investigator after the ruling of the unseen, of course, suspected that there were indications that were not good, there was an incompetent suspicion. Harli explained that his party had a proof of lawyer Marcella Santoso relating to the bribery Arif. said, there was a promise of RP. 4 suspects in a total bribery case were named suspects, namely Muhammad Arif Nuryanta as chair of the South Jakarta District Court, Marcella Santoso and Ariyanto as an advocate and a young clerk at the North Jakarta District Court, Wahyu Gunawan. ” allegedly as much as RP. Marcella Santoso and Ariyanto are known to be attorneys of three defendants in the Corporate Corporation of Cooking Oil Corruption. Wilmar Group, and the MAS group season. 11.8 trillion, and a replacement money of RP 4.8 trillion in the MAS group season. Marcella Santoso and Ariyanto allegedly gave a bribe of RP 60 billion to Muhammad Arif Nuryanta by Wahyu Gunawan. “So the case has not been proven, although the element is fulfilling the charged article, but according to the considerations of the judges it is not a criminal offense,” he added. Qohar said Arif Nuryanta at the time used his position as deputy chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court to regulate the freelance sentence to the three defendants in the corporation of the Cooking Oil Corruption case. ‘At that time, the man served as deputy chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court who currently served as chair of the South Jakarta District Court. Related to the flow of money, the investigator found sufficient evidence that the person in question allegedly received money of 60 billion Rupia for the decision of the decision. (WHN/IMK) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here

Exit mobile version