Supreme Court has reprimanded the Madhya Pradesh High Court for refusing to grant bail

The Supreme Court expressed disappointment over the order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which states that the plea of ​​the conviction for the suspension of sentence can only be accepted if it completed half the period of his sentence. A Bank of Justice Abhay’s Oka and Justice Ujjjal Bhuyan granted bail to a person and said that if there was no possibility of hearing an appeal against conviction in the near future in the high dish due to a large number of pending cases, the convicted bail should be granted. “The Supreme Court moved a new proposal on April 17,” the bank said: “We wonder that the Supreme Court has set a new resolution of the law, which has no basis.” The Pillow Court said that the Supreme Court should implement the law in the same way as it is present and that the temptator should not be forced to go for bail before him. The Supreme Court order said: “Given that the infected currency was recovered from the appellant’s pocket and that no explanation was given for this, no matter of penalty and bail was made. That was said,” the second application was submitted less than two months before the first application. Consequently, it is made clear that after completing half of the period of imprisonment, including the release of the appellant, it could resume their prayer for the suspension of the sentence.