Hasto accuses the testimony of students, KPK: was not sworn in any intervention

Jakarta -The KPK responded to the Secretary General of PDIP Hasto Kristiyanto who accused the context of the information provided by the University of Indonesia (UI) lecturer, French Asisi, as a linguist in his hearing the result of the direction and influence of KPK investigators. The KPK said that those who testified during the hearing were not sworn in no intervention. “The hearing is an open room and sworn by that what was transferred was no intervention,” KPK spokesman Budi Prasetyo said on Friday (6/13/2025), KPK spokesman. Budi said the information conveyed also has his expertise. What the expert later said will be judged by the judge. Browse to continue with content “Of course, the judge will see all information provided by experts to support the proof of this case,” he said. Previously, Hasto accused the context of the information provided by French Asisi of as a linguist in his trial the result of the direction and influence of KPK investigators. Hasto accused the statement of the expert only for the benefit of the investigator. “The testimony of knowledgeable witnesses was thus seen that the illustration that was transferred came from the investigators,” Hasto said on Thursday (12/6) at the hearing at Jakarta Corruption Court, Central Jakarta. “Of course, the purpose of means that we can understand it for the interests of the investigator acting as an investigator, as a witness mainly simultaneously,” he continued. Hasto then gave an example: French was asked to explain about the money in the message between him and the former PDIP cadre, Saful Bahri. The message is mentioned about the use of RP 200 million of RP 600 million. “When the sinanalysis text was, there was 600 for the DP 200 first, but because a perspective was built by the investigator. The 600 crackled was reduced by 200, it was out of the text,” he said. “That means, this is an illustration that is influenced by the investigator. Well, if the investigator as an examiner has at the same time as a fact, it seems that it is not a factual witness. We know all their interests,” he added, and also looked at “KPK replied: Hasto’s legal advocate is a TAKE” here: (IAL/ISA) HEEGENDS