Apple cannot leave China regardless of customs duties

During his first term, US President Donald Trump had a famous visit to a factory in Texas, during which he preferred the preference for returning ‘Apple’ production operations to the US area. In fact, that factory was a worker years before he held office. The fate of the factory was a ‘catastrophic failure’ as the company was forced to bring workers from China to address the manufacturing problems that accumulated in the heart of the United States. This story, which is reported by the former journalist at the Financial Times Patrick in his book (Apple in China), highlights the American giant technology business, ending with the grace of Washington’s biggest geopolitical opponent. The book has begun approaching how Apple sends its California engineers to China to train local workers and work with them to manufacture the most important products. But today the verse is accepted, and it all comes from the past. The “Apple” contributes to the making of the Chinese giant, and the Mughey sees that the transfer of “Apple” technologies to China through a series of small decisions that has accumulated over decades made it the largest investment business in the daring “2025” plan that was launched by President Xi Jinping to end the dependence on Western technology. Mughi wrote: “As the most famous US technical enterprise voluntary to play the role of Prometheus, and the Chinese are offering the gift of fire.” Also read: Trump is threatening “Apple” to impose a 25% fee on iPhone phones, but the central idea in the book is that “Apple” China in the technology giant we know today raises an important question: Why didn’t the company make similar investments on US land? Under Trump’s second state, and his repeated threats to impose customs duties unless the company transmits its manufacturing operations to the United States, this demand has become more urgent than ever. But the matter is that Trump’s urgency is not enough to set up the system that local governments in China with the support of Taiwanese suppliers such as ‘Hun Hai industry’ to attract ‘Apple’. One of the academics at the beginning of the book provides a simplified explanation for it, whereby China was a country “in which wages and care reduce social and human rights” that enabled suppliers to utilize a large group of migrant workers, while the local authorities could quickly intervene to suppress any protests of labor or media coverage. If there were votes I wanted to hear more in the book, the voices of these engineers would not have been from Cuperno in California, but rather the voices of Chinese workers who contributed to turning ‘Apple’ into a company whose market value exceeded three trillion dollars today. (Apple has described the allegations that the book brought as not true and full of mistakes. An army of skilled workers, but when it comes from a lesson, Trump – or to the American consumer in general – can withdraw from this reality, that is, the jobs in the field of electronic manufacturing often come to the cost of workers. Distributing the iPhone around the world. But is not in the use of users.