Akhilesh's attack on Siddharthnagar's voters list disorders, BJP invasions, said - is not going to hide dishonesty - Akhilesh Yadav Slams BJP about voters list errors in Siddharthnagar

Akhilesh’s attack on the Siddharthnagar voters list, the BJP surrounded the BJP, said: Akhilesh Yadav attacked the BJP over the disturbances in the Siddharthagar voters list, not dishonestly hidden. He said officers and election workers who target the voters list should understand that their dishonesty is not going to hide. On the complaint of the SP leader Shyamlal Pal, the chief election officer wrote a letter to the district magistrate. Akhilesh’s war against the voters list of Siddharthnagar, Jagran correspondent, Siddharthnagar. Akhilesh Yadav, president of the Samajwadi party, attacked the BJP directly on the district voters’ disturbances. He placed on X on Sunday, saying that officers and election workers who target the voters list should understand that their dishonesty is not going to hide. Fir, suspension and punishment against him are set against him. Akhilesh has written, such people will cheat on the country and society, and eventually they will be forced to live a derogatory life. Akhilesh further said that the BJP is not a stay of anyone. According to him, if the election workers direct at the request of the BJP, they will not be able to escape. In this post, Akhilesh shared the actions of the Siddharthnagar district Magistrate, in which a fir registered for the disorders to remove the name from the voters list. Actually, the state officer of the Samajwadi party, Shyamlal Pal, sent a complaint to the chief election officer. In this, the case of removing the names of Rakesh Kumar, Seshanath and Ruba was raised without the names of the voters of the Kapilvastu constituency. On the complaint, the chief election officer wrote a letter to the district magistrate Siddharthnagar and sought the report. Investigation made it clear that Blo Krishnavati Devi, who was a servant, deleted all three names without following the legal process. It was regarded as a violation of section 32 of the Public Representation Act 1950. Raja Ganpati, a fir against the CAA and also recommended the removal of him from the post.