A list of judicial mafia cases, the latest bribery case behind the Migor pronunciation

Jakarta – The practice of buying and selling matters in the world of justice comes again. The youngest, three judges who were supposed to deny the law and justice allegedly received bribes for the voice or escape against the Corric Defendant in the Crude Palm Oil (CPO) export corruption or the raw material for cooking oil. There are three corporate defendants in the Cooking Oil Corruption case from Permata Hijau Group, Wilmar Group and the MAS group season. The panel of judges in the Central Jakarta District Court who heard this case imposed a freelance sentence on the three corporate defendants on March 19, 2025. The three judges were Judge Agam Syarif Baharudin, Judge Ali Muhtaro, and Judge Djuyamto. They joined Muhammad Arif Nuryanta as chairman of the South Jakarta District Court, Marcella Santoso and Ariyanto as advocates of three corporate defendants, as well as the young Griffier at the North Jakarta Court, Wahyu Gunawan. Browse to continue the content, the freelance ruling differs a lot from the demands made by the public prosecutor. In his claims, the prosecutor demanded a replacement money of RP 937 billion from Permata Hijau Group, a replacement money to the Wilmar group of RP 11.8 trillion, and a replacement money from RP 4.8 trillion to the MAS group season. While serving as Deputy Chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court, Arif Nuryanta used his position to regulate the freelance ruling to the three defendants in the corruption case. The case was then found by the attorney -general investigator. Investigators found that there were two envelopes in Arif’s suitcase while doing a search. First, the brown envelope contains 65 1000 SGD denominations and a white envelope containing 72 USD 100 accounts. Then the investigator also confiscated Arif’s wallet in which there were hundreds of US Dollar Accounts (USD), Singapore Dollar (SGD), Malaysian Ringgit (RM) to Rupiah. Arif Nuryanta received a bribe of RP 60 billion. Every judge is splashed for bribery money. Initially, Judge Agam Syarif received 4.5 billion RP from Muhammad Arif Nuryanta. “After the RP was received 4.5 billion earlier, please (Agam Syarif) were placed in a goody bag, and after leaving the room in 3 people, namely himself, Al, and Dju,” Dirdik Jampidsus ago Abdul Qohar said at the lawyer. Arif then handed over another amount of money to the three judges in September 2024. The money given in the form of US dollars or worth 18 billion. The money was handed to Judge Djuyamto. “Please receive dollars if converted to RP 4.5 billion, DJU (Djuyamto) receives dollar money if it is converted to RP 6 billion, and all (Ali) receives money in the form of US dollars when equal to Rupiah RP. 5 billion,” Qohar said. The three judges, Kohar explains, were aware of the purpose of receiving the money, so that the case was decided by dismissal alias, sentenced. In this bribery there were already 7 people nominated as suspects. They are Muhammad Arif Nuryanto as chairman of the South Jakarta District Court; Marcella Santoso and Ariyanto as advocates; Young Registrar at the North Jakarta District Court, Wahyu Gunawan, Judge Agam Syarif Baharudin, Hakim Ali Muhtaro, Judge Djuyamto. Prosecutors’ bribery body: Between photos/Dhemas Reviyanto In 2021, former prosecutor Pinangki Safa Malasari was dragged into a case of corruption and money laundering. At the time, Pinangki served as head of monitoring and evaluation of subdivision II at the planning bureau of the youth attorney -general of the attorney -general’s office, which was proven to have received bribes from Joko Sogiarto Tjandra alias Djoko Tjandra. The Jakarta Corruption Court was sentenced to ten years in prison. Pinangki was found guilty of receiving a bribe of USD 450 thousand of Djoko Tjandra to take care of the Supreme Court (MA) Fatwa and execute TPPU and evil agreement. This sentence is higher than the prosecutor’s claim. Pinangki was stated that he had violated section 11 of the Act number 31 of 1999 regarding the eradication of corruption crimes (corruption). Pinangki is also guilty of doing evil agreement that violates Article 15 in the Article 13 of the Corruption Act. In addition, Pinangki violated the money laundering article, namely section 3 of the Act 8 of 2010 regarding Prevention and TPPU. “The legitimate criminal penalty to the defendant with a criminal ten -year imprisonment and a fine of RP. 600 million dropped, with the terms if not paid, it was replaced by imprisonment for 6 months,” Chief Justice Iglasius Eko Purwanto said while he ruled at Jakarta Corruption Court, Jalan Bungur Raya, central Jakarta, Monday, Monday read (8/2/21). Pinangki free conditioned Tuesday (6/9/2022). Head of the Banten Regional Office of the Masjuno Correctional Division said Pinangki had undergone a detention for about 2 years. The alleged bribery case of Pinangki was revealed from a viral photo on social media. In the photo there is the figure of Pinangki and a man who is none other than Djoko Tjandra. In the photo, the tab to the skin of Pinangki as a prosecutor also unveiled. Pinangki, a prosecutor who likes to travel abroad. So reveal. Pinangki is not just believed that he accepts bribes. He was also considered proof that he did money laundering from bribery received from Djoko Tjandra. The Judge of the Western Jakarta District Court receives bribery body photo: Dede Suryaman (doc.pn Jakbar) West Jakarta District Court (PN) Judge Dede Suryaman (DS) has been proven to receive a bribe of RP 300 million. Dede received bribes to facilitate the sentence in the Corruption Criminal Code (corruption) of the Brawijaya Kediri bridge. When he read the defense in the Supreme Court Court Chamber, Jalan Medan Merdeka Utara, Central Jakarta, Wednesday (9/8/2023), Dede claimed he was met by a colleague of lawyer named Yuda, who handled the corruption criminal code (corruption), he said. “That Yuda said at the meeting that he had documents about the meeting, as well as witnesses who saw it,” Dede said. After receiving the report, Dede confronted with information from Yuda to Kusdarwanto. “He apparently confirmed that he had come to Kediri to meet with his family (defendant) and conveyed a request to him,” Dede said. Then the rise of the rise of a complaint letter against right coastal darwanto. The letter made the Trust Yuda report. “Yuda has the meeting document earlier, so I’m afraid that the document is returned, reports the meeting that will receive the risk,” Dede said. Meanwhile, Dede claims he received RP. 300 million from Yuda. The figure is then divided by ad hoc -judge Emma Ellyani and coastal darwanto each RP. 100 million. Dede then gave RP. 30 million on his side for replacement clerk Hamdan. Dede claims he regretted receiving the bribe. Subsequently, Dede said that there was a difficult debate with other members of the judging panel about the verdict of the corruption case of the Brawijaya Kediri Bridge. Regarding his encounter with Yuda as the litigation as a lawyer and receipt of RP. 300m, Dede said he was sorry. “I regret that I crashed justice in the designated signs,” he concluded. The bribe of the judges free judgment Ronald Tannur Photo: Between Photos/Dhemas Reviyanto Gregory Ronald Tannur was freely sentenced by the Surabaya District Court in the case of Dini Sera’s death. The case of this early death occurred around October 2023. At the time, Dini was allegedly prosecuted by Ronald. Ronald Tannur was named a suspect and the case reached the court. Ronald was later stated that he did not kill Dini as an accusation of the prosecutor. The free verdict of Rond Tannur was highlighted. The Supreme Court (MA) subsequently declared the free ruling void. Ronald Tannur was sentenced to five years in prison. Based on the Supreme Court website, the five -year prison sentence of Ronald Tannur by the Supreme Court Judge, chaired by Seesilo, was beaten by Seekilo on Tuesday (10/22). The judge said it was proven that Ronald had committed prosecution to let Dini die. The Supreme Court also said that the prosecutor’s office could carry out Ronald Tannur immediately. On October 23, 2024, the AGO arrested three judges of the Surabaya District Court and an advocate related to alleged bribery in the free ruling of Ronald Tannur. Abdul Qohar, Director of Inquiry (Dirdik) attorney general for Young Special Crimes (Jampidsus), said the AGO had been monitoring three judges for a long time. “Investigators have been following long since the decision of the Ronald Tannur Court that we know they have all become a polemic in the wider community,” said Abdul Qohar, director of inquiry (Dirdik), at a press conference at his office, Jakarta, Wednesday (10/23/2024). The three judges who were arrested were actually Damanik, Mangapul and Heru Hanindyo. They were arrested in East Java and brought to the East Java prosecutor’s office (East Java Kejati) shortly after being named OTT. While lawyer Lisa Rahmat was arrested in Jakarta. Lisa is the lawyer of Ronald Tannur. A few days after the Attorney General’s office arrested three judges and Ronald’s lawyer, the Ago again arrested a former Supreme Court (MA) official named Zarof Ricar in Jimbaran, Bali. Zarof was named a suspect at the time for allegedly involving the alleged bribery of the free judges of Ronald Tannur. Zarof allegedly helped receive bribes to expand the free ruling of Ronald Tannur in the murder case of Dini Sera. In addition to being one of the officials in the Supreme Court, Zarof is also known as the court producer of the court. The start of bribery Lisa met with the chairman of the Surabaya District Court before bribing three judges. Lisa asked the chairman of the Surabaya District Court regarding the name of the judge who would hear the murder case Ronald Tannur heard. Head of Ago Kapuskum Harli Siregar said that Ms. Ronald Tannur, Meirizka Widjaja, contacted Lisa Rahmat to accompany her child’s legal process. Lisa Rahmat said there is a fee if Meirizka Widjaja wants the Ronald Tannur case to be managed. It is also said that Lisa explains the steps to take care of the matter. Meirizka then handed over 1.5 billion RP to Lisa Rahmat to take care of her child’s case. The amount of money was at the request of Lisa Rahmat. Around January 2024, Lisa contacted Rahmat Zarof Ricar who was later known as a former Supreme Court official (MA). Lisa asked Zarof to make an appointment with the chairman of the Surabaya District Court. Lisa Rahmat eventually met with the chairman of the Surabaya District Court and asked the judge what the Ronald Tannur case would hear. At the time, the chairman of the Surabaya District Court replied that the one who would hear was Judge really Damanik, Mangapul and Heru Hanindyo. Thereafter, Harli also revealed that Bajwa chairman of the Surabaya District Court also received a bribery ration to arrange the free defendant of Ronald Tannur. He said the chairman of the Surabaya District Court received a ration by Judge SEUah Damanik worth SGD 20 thousand. “In addition to the judges handling the case, a number of SGDs of 20 thousand are for the chairman of the Surabaya District Court,” Harli said. Harli said the bribery was given by Ronald Tannur, Meirizka Widjaja, by Judge SEUah Damanik. However, the money was not submitted. “And SGD 10 thousand for witnesses Siswanto as his committee, but the money of a number of SGDs of 20 thousand for the chairman of the Surabaya District Court and SGD 10 thousand for witnesses Siswanto, as the clerk was not handed to the person concerned and still held by Witness Damanik,” Harli said. Six people were named suspects in the alleged bribery case of the free ruling of Ronald Tannur. The suspects are: 1. Judge reallyuah Damanik2. Judge Mangapul3. Judge Heru Hanindy4. Attorney Lisa Rahmat5. Ex -Official mother Zarof Ricar6. Mrs. Ronald Tannur, Meirizka Widjaja. Meirizka allegedly gave a 3.5 billion bribe to the judges, so Ronald was sentenced to be free. As a result, Ronald received a free sentence from the Surabaya District Court Judge. (Deck/DHN) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here