How do you recover from the addiction "Chat GBT"?

Edison Earl, a young man who has a university degree, is trained at Bournemouth University of Arts in England, where he offers a brilliant professional performance. He produced an unprecedented amount of marketing content for the university and managed to double the number of followers via “Instagram” within seven months. However, it is difficult to attribute this achievement to himself, because the ‘chat GBT’ has taken over most of the work. For the past two years, Edison has written some of his ideas on paper to ask most of his day, ‘Chat BT’, for example: ‘Can you reformulate this e -mail?’ Or “What do you think of this post and this event?” The use of the application is not only limited to professional matters, but also requests his help in his daily life, from choosing his food to the choice of his clothing. Also read: The easiest and smarter. Soon an updated version of “chatgpt” “al -muhtifaq syndrome” Earl admits that it became largely dependent on this instrument that was introduced by “Oben Ai” in the late 2022, and is currently regularly used by more than 400 million people in the world. This tool is marketed, as well as similar software such as “Gimenyi” from “Google”, “alphabet” and “Claude” from “Anthropic”, as if it were a digital trainee or a search assistant. Regarding the negative factors affiliated with some of the pupils and beginners who spoke to them, it is that excessive dependence on artificial intelligence began to hinder their professional progress and undermined their confidence and agreed with their feeling of what was called ‘fraudulent syndrome’. Earl said: “My confidence has achieved it, I lost confidence in my decisions and how I think.” A study by the Dutch administrative consulting company “Bearing Point” revealed this year, and this included more than 300 managers in Europe and the United States that young employees use artificial intelligence instruments at a higher rate than the managers of medium level and senior managers, often because they still build their ‘internal compass’. When it comes to senior officials, they often ignore these instruments because of their confidence in their experiences, perhaps too much, unlike new employees. Earl remembers how he was proud of his work before he started using the ‘GBT chat’, but now he feels an internal vacuum that the source cannot determine. He said, “I became more lazy … I use directly on artificial intelligence, because in my mind I will give a better answer.” This attachment can have a huge impact on a young man in the first place of his life. A human resource officer said this week that a new employee acknowledged that she did not know how to contribute to employee meetings. When asked about reason, she said that she started her career during the closing period during the corona pandemic, and rely on the ‘hand lifting’ function on the virtual meeting platform “Microsoft Times”. With the absence of this in real life, she had to learn how to talk and express her opinion on the meetings. Appendix affects all aspects of life, the effect of this attachment to artificial intelligence is not limited to the label of handling the office, but can also cause a decrease in the skills of critical thinking, a phenomenon that researchers have warned against Microsoft as noticed by Earl. He said, “I feel that my thoughts have become in lethargy … I no longer challenge myself, and do not immerse my mind.” Of course, it is not white or black, as “chat GBT” has many positive aspects. For example, Earl helped to track those he spends if he intended the bar and other places, which enabled him to control his budget for the first time. He also used his phone camera to photograph store shelves so that the application helps him choose the clothes he buys, which strengthens his confidence in his appearance. But Earl doesn’t have the pleasure of exploring when he goes shopping and making mistakes. He said: “That feeling that hit me when I entered a shop and addressed a piece of my taste … I no longer feel it. I started buying things just because (chat GBT) told me to do.” Also read: “Oben Ai” launches the “Chatgpt” service more intelligent with $ 200 a month. This may seem an exaggerated example, but increasing evidence suggests that many, especially the youth category that used to use artificial intelligence instruments to perform their school duties, rely on this technology in different aspects of their professional and personal life. One of the recent studies attributes this to the attractive method in which conversational robots are completed very quickly, and also to their friendly reactions. Received answers, the effect of these friendly answers can be greater than we think. For example, suggest, for example, the good feeling you have if you receive praise, and take into account that the ‘GBT chat’ and artificial intelligence programs often provide answers that include a lot of compliment and encouragement. Sam Altman, the founding partner of “Oben Ai”, admitted a short time ago that the latest version of the instrument “has become too much too much”, and that his team is currently fighting it. Also read: “Openii” withdraws a new update for “chatgpt” that has more flattering and deceived, has shown a search of “ophan ai” of which the results were published last month that the majority of “CBT” users have a healthy relationship with the platform, although some of the users who are on them begin to show indications of “emotional attachment”. The monitoring of random experience that included 981 participants concluded that this category shows the “problematic use” pattern. Meanwhile, Sam Altman faces a challenge to maintain an accurate balance, making it the users of ‘chat GBT’ who pay subscriptions, or perhaps see ads in the future, without turning the platform into an extra reason for our addiction to small screens. Earl realized that he may have become a prisoner of the habit of using artificial intelligence last week decided to cancel his subscription to “Chat BT”, which costs 20 pounds a month ($ 30). And he went by almost two days until he started to feel more in his work, and it is strange that he noticed an improvement in his productivity. He said, “I feel like I’m working again … I plan, think and write.” The weakening of spiritual abilities, but refraining from using the entire artificial intelligence, may not be the solution, especially in light of the dependence on others of his instruments to gain a competitive advantage. The challenge facing Earl and other young people in the job market is to use this instrument without requesting them to weaken their mental abilities. “Critical thinking is a muscle thinking that needs a continuous exercise,” said Sherrill Einhorn, the Decision Services Foundation, and an assistant professor at Cornell University. Einhurn advised two steps to prevent all tasks from delegating conversational robots. First, “Think of your decision and then test its durability using artificial intelligence.” As for the second advice, it is the verification of the answers of the conversational robots. She said, “You can ask him, How have you achieved this recommendation?”, Adding that artificial intelligence can be biased like people. Also read: defining the labor market with artificial intelligence, the phenomenon of Earl’s attempt to achieve a healthy balance in the use of artificial intelligence becomes one of the most important challenges its generation faces. But the responsibility does not fall on it alone; Technology businesses, in turn, are obliged to create products that improve mental capabilities instead of weakening them. A broader discussion must be opened on how to demarcate healthy boundaries in dealing with artificial intelligence. Earl is appreciated in this context, and we need more of them.