3 judges of bribery -suspects, former KPK investigators: aggravate the image of the court

Jakarta -Former KPK investigating officer Yudi Purnomo Harahap emphasized the prison in 3 judges as a suspicious bribery on the unspeakable ruling or a loose decision on the corruption of the export of raw materials for oil. He was of the opinion that the world of justice was increasingly concerned with the judicial Mafia case. “The judicial mafia that makes the images of the court worse in the eyes of the community. As if judges affected by corruption cases did not make up both of the elements of the District Court to the Supreme Court,” Yudi told reporters on Monday (4/14/2025). Yudi regretted that the judicial mafia case was repeated. Previously, it took place at the Surabaya District Court (PN) and the youngest in the Central Jakarta District Court. Browse to continue the content “Unfortunately in these last two cases, both Surabaya District Court and the Central Jakarta District Court, legal advisors are also involved,” he said. According to Yudi, the problem of the judicial mafia occurred because of the lack of judges. Because, he said, judges’ superiors in court and three panel of judges were also hit by the decision ordered, which means it was already serious. “No matter how good the supervision of Pimpiman is if people who supervise will certainly be difficult. Even corruption in the judge is also influenced by the lifestyle and greedy nature of the judges,” Yudi said. “If there is no concrete conduct to the integrity of judges who have a broad authority to send the verdict, the corruption rate will naturally continue to repeat. Because the salary of any amount will not be enough to face a large offer, for example, in this case, it is thought that RP. 60 billion,” he added. Previously, the chairman of the South Jakarta District Court, Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, was named a suspect related to the bribery case of dealing with cases in the Central Jakarta District Court. In addition, there were also 3 judges, as well as the young clerk at the North Jakarta District Court and the lawyer who was also nominated as a suspect in this case. Cases of bribery and satisfaction are related to the judgment of the unstague or loose decisions in the case of corruption in the export of raw materials for cooking oil. At the time, the panel of judges gave a loose decision to the corporate defendant. The three judges were Judge Agam Syarif Baharudin, Judge Ali Muhtaro and Judge Djuyamto. The three allegedly received a bribe worth RP 22.5 billion for the freelance sentence. The three judges, along with Muhammad Arif Nuryanta, compiled as chair of the South Jakarta District Court; Marcella Santoso and Ariyanto as advocates; As well as the young registrar at the North Jakarta District Court, Wahyu Gunawan. (FAS/IDN) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here