Ago ensured that the investigation into the Ronald Tannur case continued

Jakarta -The Attorney’s Office (ago) office calls the bribery scandal of judges who sentenced the loose decision to the corporation in the case of alleged corruption in the supply of export facilities for cooking oil raw materials from the investigation into the bribery case of free judgment against Gregory Ronald Tannur in the Surabaya Court. There, the investigator found electronic evidence of the practice of bribery. “Indeed, this case, there is this case, this information has emerged, when we performed developments related to the Surabaya (PN) case, Ronald Tannur,” said Tuesday (4/15/2025) Night, Director of Inquiry (Dirdik) Jampids Age ADBul Qohar. When asked if the clerk named Wahyu Gunawan (WG), now mentioned as a suspect, was previously an intermediary for the match between the judge and the defendant’s attorney, Qohar was reluctant to answer. He just mentioned that the revelation provides case management. Browse to continue the content “The question is whether the previous revelation also handled matters like this? We didn’t get there. But the facts we got were revelation initiatives,” Qohar said. Although he has currently investigated the case of a bribery scandal of the Migor case, Qohar has assured that his party also continued to continue the investigation into bribery cases related to Ronald Tannur’s free ruling that was demolished earlier this year. “So, friends of journalists are patient, the Surabaya case so far continues to develop,” Qohar said. “When we were quiet, that didn’t mean the matter stopped,” he continued. Qohar explained that in our legal system there was a process of inquiry and investigation. The two processes are one unit to investigate a matter thoroughly. “The investigation is a sub -system rather than the investigation, of course if the investigation is not possible, it is impossible to publish. The name is just an investigation, yes, we will definitely do silence. Silence does not mean to stop,” Qohar explained again. “This is please understood because it is not a pro -justification. If the investigation is revealed that you want to investigate, the evidence will be eliminated,” he continued. Then, when asked in more detail about where the electronic testimony came from, whether from the former Supreme Court official (MA) or another party, Qohar again clearly answered. Because, he said, it was included in the contents of the investigation. “The question of journalists is indeed exactly the same as this investigator.” I said, the development of the Surabaya Surabaya case was the investigation. (Ond/FCA) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here