Why is the definition of 'gangster' not yet decided? The Supreme Court reprimanded the Punjab government; Know the whole case - Punjab and Haryana High Court question the state government over a lack of definition for gangster

Why is the definition of ‘gangster’ not yet decided? The Supreme Court reprimanded the Punjab government; Know the whole case, the Punjab and Haryana High Court reprimanded the state government and asked why the definition of the word gangster was not decided. The court instructed the government to provide all the documents related to the formation of the Organized Crime Control Unit and the formation of an anti-course task group. In addition, information was also sought on the current status of the Punjab Control or Organized Crime Act. The Supreme Court has asked the government why the definition of ‘gangster’ has not yet been decided (file photo) Dayanand Sharma, Chandigarh. The Punjab and Haryana High Court reprimanded the state government and asked why the definition of the word ‘gangster’ was not decided. The court also ordered the Punjab government to produce all documents associated with the formation of the organized crime control unit and an anti -passer task force. In addition, it was also asked that the current status of the Punjab Control or Organized Crime Act currently being considered the home department. The case to submit an answer on April 8 will be listed for trial on Tuesday. Earlier on April 3, when the case came to the Court of Justice Harkesh Manuja, he asked Punjab police officer to explain whether or not the word ‘gangster’ was defined in any law of the state. The AIG searched for two weeks at the court, but the court instructed the state to submit a hearing and instructed the state to submit its answer in this regard. The court sought this information from the state government, the lawyer of the requester also said in court that there was surprising that no legal definition of the word ‘gangster’ was given in any law. The court had earlier asked the state government to explain whether a separate law had been issued to deal with organized crimes. It was also asked how many such firs were submitted across the state in which ordinary people said that there was a threat of the life of ‘gang members’. This order gave by the court during the petition of Simarjit Singh while hearing a contempt request filed by 42 -year -old Simarjit Singh, resident of Gurdaspur. In the petition, he claimed a contempt of court against Punjab’s ADGP (safety) Sudhanshu Srivastava. Vakil said his client was threatened to withdraw the fir filed by some criminals, and therefore he approached the court for safety. He said that Simarjit Singh received threats to kill Gangster Lovepreet Singh alias Lavi, a co -worker of the notorious criminal sukhmeet partner Singh Alias ​​Sukh Bhikhariwal, to kill him. Also read strict instructions Punjab: BJP leader Manoranjan Kalia’s house-e-rick youths have thrown explosives, police have investigated, now every big news from your city, now on your phone. Download the most reliable companion of Local News Afjagran Local App.