"Tek Talk" requests the suspension of the US prohibition until the Supreme Court decision is issued

“Tap Talk” has a suspension of a US legislation that “requests the Chinese parent company” request “. BiteDance Ltd) to sell or prohibit the application in order to give the US Supreme Court an opportunity to review it. On Monday, the company explained in a file submitted to the appeal in the Washington Circuit that the suspension of the law could also determine the position of the president and that the president of the President of Donald should determine, what the position could determine, what the positioning could determine, determine the positioning, and that the president of Donald should determine, which can determine the position, which can determine the position, which can determine his position. Donald must determine. Review the Supreme Court. “The company said that the remark would not pose a ‘threatening threat to national security’ or ‘material damage to the government’. However, the government asked the court to quickly reject the request for the” technical talk “. of the government. -Application has become a basic platform for Americans, which made the ban on a thorny political matter. More than 170 million Americans use the application to acquire news and entertainment, while much depends on developing small projects. ‘Tech Talk’ estimated that US small businesses could lose revenue of more than one billion dollars if the application is only closed one month. The effects of the ban on “Tap Talk” in the file submitted, warned the company that the ban on “one of the most important platforms for expression in the country” will cause “irreplaceable damage” by the silence of the users of the application. She also indicated that the embargo would form a serious blow to her work, which is difficult to attract advertisers and employ skills. She estimated that her targeted revenue from global advertising could drop by 29% for the next year if the application was banned for one month. Tek Talk is also of the opinion that time must be granted to the upcoming administration to address the situation, pointing out that the administration can suspend the implementation of the law or “reduce its serious consequences”. She explained that the law gives the President and the Attorney General “broad forces” regarding the timing of its provisions. Matthew Steinham, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, suggested that the Court of Appeal reject the request of ‘Tok Tok’, especially after the ruling that was significantly and difficult to appeal. ‘Tok Tok’ asked the court to make a decision on the urgent rescue by December 16 to give the company enough time to request a suspension of the Supreme Court if needed. The company has a team of senior advocates specialized before the Supreme Court, including Nawil Francisco, who was a public lawyer during the Trump administration, specialized, and Andrew Pinkos, former US Secretary -General.